These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1608262)

  • 1. Consistent within-session measures of tinnitus.
    Penner MJ; Bilger RC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 1608262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous measurement of tinnitus pitch and loudness.
    Penner MJ; Saran A
    Ear Hear; 1994 Dec; 15(6):416-21. PubMed ID: 7895937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring tinnitus parameters: loudness, pitch, and maskability.
    Mitchell CR; Vernon JA; Creedon TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):139-51. PubMed ID: 8318704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measures of tinnitus: step size, matches to imagined tones, and masking patterns.
    Penner MJ; Klafter EJ
    Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):410-6. PubMed ID: 1487103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of iPod-Based Automated Tinnitus Pitch Matching.
    Wunderlich R; Stein A; Engell A; Lau P; Waasem L; Shaykevich A; Rudack C; Pantev C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 25690779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of tinnitus on quality of life, loudness and pitch match, and high-frequency audiometry.
    Prestes R; Daniela G
    Int Tinnitus J; 2009; 15(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 20420337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choice of test stimulus matters for pitch matching performance: Comparison between pure tone and narrow band noise.
    Wollbrink A; Dobel C; Salvari V; Paraskevopoulos E; Kisker C; Mittmann K; Pantev C
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107776. PubMed ID: 31401433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-automated tinnitus assessment: noise-band matching, maskability, and residual inhibition.
    Henry JA; Roberts LE; Ellingson RM; Thielman EJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):486-504. PubMed ID: 23886426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnitude estimation and the "paradoxical" loudness of tinnitus.
    Penner MJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 3762105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring tinnitus loudness using constrained psychophysical scaling.
    Ward LM; Baumann M
    Am J Audiol; 2009 Dec; 18(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 19638478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of variability among measurements of subjective tinnitus and objective stimuli.
    Burns EM
    Audiology; 1984; 23(4):426-40. PubMed ID: 6466204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Equal-loudness contours using subjective tinnitus as the standard.
    Penner MJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Jun; 27(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 6738040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychoacoustic assessment to improve tinnitus diagnosis.
    Basile CÉ; Fournier P; Hutchins S; Hébert S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e82995. PubMed ID: 24349414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tinnitus Synthesis: Fluctuant and Stable Matches to the Pitch of Tinnitus.
    Penner MJ
    Int Tinnitus J; 1995; 1(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 10753327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tinnitus as a source of internal noise.
    Penner MJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 3762104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tinnitus loudness tracking: a "type V Békésy" pattern does not exist for pseudotinnitus.
    Steiger JR; Thielman EJ; Henry JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):920-6. PubMed ID: 24384078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of different methods for assessing the 'intensity' of tinnitus.
    Hallam RS; Jakes SC; Chambers C; Hinchcliffe R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1985; 99(5-6):501-8. PubMed ID: 4024897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory test result characteristics of subjects with and without tinnitus.
    Henry JA; James KE; Owens K; Zaugg T; Porsov E; Silaski G
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(5):619-32. PubMed ID: 19882495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tinnitus pitch: a comparison of three measurement methods.
    Tyler RS; Conrad-Armes D
    Br J Audiol; 1983 May; 17(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 6626779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The superiority of the Goodwin procedure over the traditional procedure in measuring the loudness level of tinnitus.
    Risey J; Briner W; Guth PS; Norris CH
    Ear Hear; 1989 Oct; 10(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 2792585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.