139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16082817)
21. Part-list cuing can be transient and lasting: the role of encoding.
Bäuml KH; Aslan A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 16478338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Towards augmented human memory: Retrieval-induced forgetting and retrieval practice in an interactive, end-of-day review.
Cinel C; Cortis Mack C; Ward G
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 May; 147(5):632-661. PubMed ID: 29745709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Word-fragment cuing: the lexical search hypothesis.
Nelson DL; Keelean PD; Negrao M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 2524544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reducing negative emotional memories by retroactive interference.
Hensley CJ; Otani H; Knoll AR
Cogn Emot; 2019 Jun; 33(4):801-815. PubMed ID: 30056784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. State-dependent effects of alcohol on recollective experience, familiarity and awareness of memories.
Duka T; Weissenborn R; Dienes Z
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 Jan; 153(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 11271401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Degree of learning, interpolated tests, and rate of forgetting.
Rose RJ
Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):621-32. PubMed ID: 1435265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Different reactivation procedures enable or prevent episodic memory updating.
Scully ID; Hupbach A
Hippocampus; 2020 Aug; 30(8):806-814. PubMed ID: 31520566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The dual effect of context on memory of related and unrelated themes: discrimination at encoding and cue at retrieval.
Levy-Gigi E; Vakil E
Memory; 2012; 20(7):728-41. PubMed ID: 22809325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited.
Verde MF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1433-48. PubMed ID: 23687918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of the encoding factors that produce the negative repetition effect.
Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 24548323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The emergence of all-or-none retrieval of chunks in verbal serial recall.
Shafaghat Ardebili A; Liu YS; Caplan JB
Mem Cognit; 2024 Feb; 52(2):352-372. PubMed ID: 37801193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The retrieval practice effect in associative recognition.
Verde MF
Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1265-72. PubMed ID: 15900920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cued recall and release from proactive interference in Alzheimer's disease.
Cushman LA; Como PG; Booth H; Caine ED
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1988 Dec; 10(6):685-92. PubMed ID: 3235645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency.
Miller AL; Unsworth N
Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1149-1163. PubMed ID: 29845592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Retrieval-induced forgetting is retrieval-modality specific: Evidence from motor memory.
Tempel T; Frings C
Cognition; 2017 May; 162():143-152. PubMed ID: 28242345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retrieval induces forgetting, but only when nontested items compete for retrieval: Implication for interference, inhibition, and context reinstatement.
Chan JC; Erdman MR; Davis SD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1298-315. PubMed ID: 25621869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Lateral asymmetry of retroactive inhibition in a psychomotor skill.
Hicks RE
J Gen Psychol; 1975 Apr; 92(2d Half):205-10. PubMed ID: 1141874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Are independent probes truly independent?
Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG; Zeelenberg R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):934-42. PubMed ID: 19586262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
