These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16083091)
1. Off with their heads: the need to criminalize some forms of scientific misconduct. Redman BK; Caplan AL J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 16083091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research. Steinberg NA South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research misconduct involving noncompliance in human subjects research supported by the public health service: reconciling separate regulatory systems. Bierer BE; Barnes M; Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(4 Spec No):S2-26. PubMed ID: 25043467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Responding to scientific misconduct. Due process and prevention. Mishkin B JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1932-6. PubMed ID: 3418855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches. Pascal CB Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):9-32. PubMed ID: 12569921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct. Sovacool BK Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The logical geography of concepts and shared responsibilities concerning research misconduct. Guenin LM Acad Med; 1996 Jun; 71(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 9125915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Resnik DB Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Public trust and institutional culture. Commentary. Capron AM; Hurley EA; Davis AL Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(4 Spec No):S35-6. PubMed ID: 25043472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Why guidance comes from the research community. Commentary. Wright DE Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(4 Spec No):S27-8. PubMed ID: 25043468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The search for a cure: combating the problem of conflicts of interest that currently plagues biomedical research. Clamon JB Iowa Law Rev; 2003 Oct; 89(1):235-71. PubMed ID: 15732180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Correctable Myths About Research Misconduct in the Biomedical Sciences. Redman BK Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Apr; 25(2):621-629. PubMed ID: 29404973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical-research official cites ethics woes. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 2000 Aug; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11873777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The irregular terrain of human subjects research regulations. Commentary. Forster D; Nelson DK; Borasky D; Botkin JR Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(4 Spec No):S29-30. PubMed ID: 25043469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Data audit by a regulatory agency: its effect and implication for others. Shapiro MF Account Res; 1992; 2(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 11653981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. More gold and more fleece: improving the legal sanctions against medical research fraud. O'Reilly JT Adm Law Rev; 1990; 42(3):393-422. PubMed ID: 15991411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law. Sise CB San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]