These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16083384)

  • 1. Racial differences in socially desirable responding in selection contexts: magnitude and consequences.
    Dudley NM; McFarland LA; Goodman SA; Hunt ST; Sydell EJ
    J Pers Assess; 2005 Aug; 85(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 16083384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Substance and style in socially desirable responding.
    Lönnqvist JE; Paunonen S; Tuulio-Henriksson A; Lönnqvist J; Verkasalo M
    J Pers; 2007 Apr; 75(2):291-322. PubMed ID: 17359240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positive response distortion by police officer applicants: association of Paulhus Deception Scales With MMPI-2 and Inwald Personality Inventory Validity Scales.
    Detrick P; Chibnall JT
    Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 18258735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Socially desirable responding on the web: investigating the candor hypothesis.
    Risko EF; Quilty LC; Oakman JM
    J Pers Assess; 2006 Dec; 87(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 17134335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Socially desirable responding and its elusive effects on the validity of personality assessments.
    Paunonen SV; LeBel EP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):158-75. PubMed ID: 22564012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Socially desirable responding and the factorial stability of the NEO PI-R.
    Marshall MB; De Fruyt F; Rolland JP; Bagby RM
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Sep; 17(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 16262464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incremental validity of the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores: a replication and extension.
    Bing MN; Whanger JC; Davison HK; VanHook JB
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 14769127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Socially desirable responding by bariatric surgery candidates during psychological assessment.
    Ambwani S; Boeka AG; Brown JD; Byrne TK; Budak AR; Sarwer DB; Fabricatore AN; Morey LC; O'Neil PM
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2013; 9(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 21924688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of elaboration on socially desirable responding and the validity of biodata measures.
    Schmitt N; Oswald FL; Kim BH; Gillespie MA; Ramsay LJ; Yoo TY
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Dec; 88(6):979-88. PubMed ID: 14640810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A test of the factor structure equivalence of the 50-item IPIP Five-factor model measure across gender and ethnic groups.
    Ehrhart KH; Roesch SC; Ehrhart MG; Kilian B
    J Pers Assess; 2008 Sep; 90(5):507-16. PubMed ID: 18704810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection.
    Hogan J; Barrett P; Hogan R
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1270-85. PubMed ID: 17845085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro fertilization-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments.
    Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I; Bonduelle M; Barnes J; Nekkebroeck J; Loft A; Wennerholm UB; Tarlatzis BC; Peters C; Hagberg BS; Berner A; Sutcliffe AG
    Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):e283-9. PubMed ID: 15741353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault.
    Dutton DG; Hemphill KJ
    Violence Vict; 1992; 7(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 1504031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Less Evaluative Measures of Personality in Job Applicant Contexts: The Effect on Socially Desirable Responding and Criterion Validity.
    Wood JK; Anglim J; Horwood S
    J Pers Assess; 2024; 106(3):372-383. PubMed ID: 37703381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent validity of the MMPI-2 feminine gender role (GF) and masculine gender role (GM) scales.
    Johnson ME; Jones G; Brems C
    J Pers Assess; 1996 Feb; 66(1):153-68. PubMed ID: 8576829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive impression management and its influence on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: a comparison of analog and differential prevalence group designs.
    Bagby RM; Marshall MB
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 14593833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the balanced inventory of desirable responding.
    Stöber J; Dette DE; Musch J
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Apr; 78(2):370-89. PubMed ID: 12067199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An openness scale for the California Psychological Inventory.
    Hakstian AR; Farrell S
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Feb; 76(1):107-34. PubMed ID: 11206293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the balanced inventory of desirable responding: evidence in favor of a revised model of socially desirable responding.
    Gignac GE
    J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 23862685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Raymark PH; Roth PL
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):536-52. PubMed ID: 15910148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.