107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16083384)
1. Racial differences in socially desirable responding in selection contexts: magnitude and consequences.
Dudley NM; McFarland LA; Goodman SA; Hunt ST; Sydell EJ
J Pers Assess; 2005 Aug; 85(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 16083384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Substance and style in socially desirable responding.
Lönnqvist JE; Paunonen S; Tuulio-Henriksson A; Lönnqvist J; Verkasalo M
J Pers; 2007 Apr; 75(2):291-322. PubMed ID: 17359240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positive response distortion by police officer applicants: association of Paulhus Deception Scales With MMPI-2 and Inwald Personality Inventory Validity Scales.
Detrick P; Chibnall JT
Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 18258735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Socially desirable responding on the web: investigating the candor hypothesis.
Risko EF; Quilty LC; Oakman JM
J Pers Assess; 2006 Dec; 87(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 17134335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Socially desirable responding and its elusive effects on the validity of personality assessments.
Paunonen SV; LeBel EP
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):158-75. PubMed ID: 22564012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Socially desirable responding and the factorial stability of the NEO PI-R.
Marshall MB; De Fruyt F; Rolland JP; Bagby RM
Psychol Assess; 2005 Sep; 17(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 16262464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incremental validity of the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores: a replication and extension.
Bing MN; Whanger JC; Davison HK; VanHook JB
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 14769127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Socially desirable responding by bariatric surgery candidates during psychological assessment.
Ambwani S; Boeka AG; Brown JD; Byrne TK; Budak AR; Sarwer DB; Fabricatore AN; Morey LC; O'Neil PM
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2013; 9(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 21924688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of elaboration on socially desirable responding and the validity of biodata measures.
Schmitt N; Oswald FL; Kim BH; Gillespie MA; Ramsay LJ; Yoo TY
J Appl Psychol; 2003 Dec; 88(6):979-88. PubMed ID: 14640810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A test of the factor structure equivalence of the 50-item IPIP Five-factor model measure across gender and ethnic groups.
Ehrhart KH; Roesch SC; Ehrhart MG; Kilian B
J Pers Assess; 2008 Sep; 90(5):507-16. PubMed ID: 18704810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection.
Hogan J; Barrett P; Hogan R
J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1270-85. PubMed ID: 17845085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro fertilization-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments.
Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I; Bonduelle M; Barnes J; Nekkebroeck J; Loft A; Wennerholm UB; Tarlatzis BC; Peters C; Hagberg BS; Berner A; Sutcliffe AG
Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):e283-9. PubMed ID: 15741353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault.
Dutton DG; Hemphill KJ
Violence Vict; 1992; 7(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 1504031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Less Evaluative Measures of Personality in Job Applicant Contexts: The Effect on Socially Desirable Responding and Criterion Validity.
Wood JK; Anglim J; Horwood S
J Pers Assess; 2024; 106(3):372-383. PubMed ID: 37703381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concurrent validity of the MMPI-2 feminine gender role (GF) and masculine gender role (GM) scales.
Johnson ME; Jones G; Brems C
J Pers Assess; 1996 Feb; 66(1):153-68. PubMed ID: 8576829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive impression management and its influence on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: a comparison of analog and differential prevalence group designs.
Bagby RM; Marshall MB
Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 14593833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the balanced inventory of desirable responding.
Stöber J; Dette DE; Musch J
J Pers Assess; 2002 Apr; 78(2):370-89. PubMed ID: 12067199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An openness scale for the California Psychological Inventory.
Hakstian AR; Farrell S
J Pers Assess; 2001 Feb; 76(1):107-34. PubMed ID: 11206293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling the balanced inventory of desirable responding: evidence in favor of a revised model of socially desirable responding.
Gignac GE
J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 23862685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation.
Van Iddekinge CH; Raymark PH; Roth PL
J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):536-52. PubMed ID: 15910148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
