These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1608440)

  • 21. Her study shattered the myth that fraud in science is a rarity.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scientific misconduct. Ill-defined, redefined.
    Palca J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):4. PubMed ID: 8891701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Misconduct in research. Misconduct is not reported in biomedical journals in France.
    Maisonneuve H
    BMJ; 1996 Jul; 313(7049):109. PubMed ID: 8688718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
    Steele F
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography.
    Anderson J
    J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Science, fraud and the Baltimore case.
    Bernstein J
    Commentary; 1998 Dec; 106(6):40-4. PubMed ID: 15986525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical study reflections: another view: Commentary on: "Raising suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: detecting misconduct".
    Spitzig P
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):705-11. PubMed ID: 21052860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fraud in medical research.
    Lock S
    Issues Med Ethics; 1997; 5(4):112-4. PubMed ID: 16267905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fraud squad files report to prosecutor in Inserm case.
    Butler D
    Nature; 1998 Jul; 394(6691):308. PubMed ID: 9690461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ruling brings cash windfall in US fraud case.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1995 May; 375(6529):270. PubMed ID: 7753183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reply to Ernhart, Scarr, and Geneson.
    Needleman HL
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 11653084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. University forced to pay $1.6 million to researcher.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Aug; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fraud claims shake German complacency.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):750. PubMed ID: 9194549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preventing scientific misconduct.
    Weed DL
    Am J Public Health; 1998 Jan; 88(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 9584019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On being an authentic scientist.
    Smith ML
    IRB; 1992; 14(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
    Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
    IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Revoking the licenses of dishonest academics.
    Holder AR
    IRB; 1990; 12(2):9-10. PubMed ID: 11650370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.