These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16084872)

  • 1. High rates of embryo wastage with use of assisted reproductive technology: a look at the trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States.
    Kovalevsky G; Patrizio P
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):325-30. PubMed ID: 16084872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.
    Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2002.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2005 Jun; 54(2):1-24. PubMed ID: 15931153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2003.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2006 May; 55(4):1-22. PubMed ID: 16723970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
    Jain T; Missmer SA; Hornstein MD
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(16):1639-45. PubMed ID: 15084696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006.
    Sunderam S; Chang J; Flowers L; Kulkarni A; Sentelle G; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2009 Jun; 58(5):1-25. PubMed ID: 19521336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing the number of blastocyst stage embryos to transfer on day 5 or 6 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
    Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Racowsky C; Surrey ES;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 18222441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1207-20. PubMed ID: 15136079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Embryo wastage rates remain high in assisted reproductive technology (ART): a look at the trends from 2004-2013 in the USA.
    Ghazal S; Patrizio P
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Feb; 34(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 28028774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of retained embryos on the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies.
    Lee HC; Seifer DB; Shelden RM
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Aug; 82(2):334-7. PubMed ID: 15302280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing the number of cleavage stage embryos to transfer on day 3 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
    Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Surrey ES; Racowsky C;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 18321489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2004.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Chen M; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2007 Jun; 56(6):1-22. PubMed ID: 17557073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2005.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2008 Jun; 57(5):1-23. PubMed ID: 18566567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) be used to accurately report clinic total reproductive potential (TRP)?
    Stern JE; Hickman TN; Kinzer D; Penzias AS; Ball GD; Gibbons WE
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Apr; 97(4):886-9. PubMed ID: 22265036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimum number of embryos to transfer in women more than 40 years of age undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technologies.
    Combelles CM; Orasanu B; Ginsburg ES; Racowsky C
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1637-42. PubMed ID: 16359957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.