323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16084887)
1. One last chance for pregnancy: a review of 2,705 in vitro fertilization cycles initiated in women age 40 years and above.
Klipstein S; Regan M; Ryley DA; Goldman MB; Alper MM; Reindollar RH
Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 16084887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of 2,386 consecutive cycles of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection using autologous oocytes in women aged 40 years and above.
Serour G; Mansour R; Serour A; Aboulghar M; Amin Y; Kamal O; Al-Inany H; Aboulghar M
Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1707-12. PubMed ID: 19896654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing the number of blastocyst stage embryos to transfer on day 5 or 6 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Racowsky C; Surrey ES;
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 18222441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimizing the number of cleavage stage embryos to transfer on day 3 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Surrey ES; Racowsky C;
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 18321489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimum number of embryos to transfer in women more than 40 years of age undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technologies.
Combelles CM; Orasanu B; Ginsburg ES; Racowsky C
Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1637-42. PubMed ID: 16359957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cumulative live birth rates in cohorts of patients treated with in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Witsenburg C; Dieben S; Van der Westerlaken L; Verburg H; Naaktgeboren N
Fertil Steril; 2005 Jul; 84(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 16009164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The singleton, term gestation, and live birth rate per cycle initiated: a 1-year experience in in vitro fertilization cycles with native and donated oocytes.
Bellver J; Albert C; Soares SR; Alvarez C; Pellicer A
Fertil Steril; 2005 May; 83(5):1404-9. PubMed ID: 15866576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transfer of two versus three embryos in women less than 40 years old undergoing frozen transfer cycles.
Berin I; Engmann LL; Benadiva CA; Schmidt DW; Nulsen JC; Maier DB
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):355-9. PubMed ID: 19324343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos.
Riggs R; Mayer J; Dowling-Lacey D; Chi TF; Jones E; Oehninger S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 19027110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Frattarelli JL; Miller KA; Miller BT; Elkind-Hirsch K; Scott RT
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17765235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of assisted hatching in women younger than 38 years undergoing in vitro fertilization.
Hagemann AR; Lanzendorf SE; Jungheim ES; Chang AS; Ratts VS; Odem RR
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 19268926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A GnRH agonist and exogenous hormone stimulation protocol has a higher live-birth rate than a natural endogenous hormone protocol for frozen-thawed blastocyst-stage embryo transfer cycles: an analysis of 1391 cycles.
Hill MJ; Miller KA; Frattarelli JL
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):416-22. PubMed ID: 19171338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2189-201. PubMed ID: 19439295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2001 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2005 Sep; 84(3):590-9. PubMed ID: 16169390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Final ART success rates: a 10 years survey.
Gnoth C; Maxrath B; Skonieczny T; Friol K; Godehardt E; Tigges J
Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):2239-46. PubMed ID: 21659314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of legislation on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology: lessons from the 2004 Italian law.
La Sala GB; Villani MT; Nicoli A; Valli B; Iannotti F; Blickstein I
Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 17681340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in anonymous shared versus exclusive donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles.
Mullin CM; Fino ME; Talebian S; Keegan D; Grifo JA; Licciardi F
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):574-8. PubMed ID: 19815192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
