270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16084897)
1. Confirmation of Essure microinsert tubal coil placement with conventional and volume-contrast imaging three-dimensional ultrasound.
Thiel JA; Suchet IB; Lortie K
Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 16084897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of three-dimensional ultrasound examination classification to check the position of the tubal sterilization microinsert.
Legendre G; Gervaise A; Levaillant JM; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Fernandez H
Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2732-5. PubMed ID: 20451183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative Factors that Predict the Successful Placement of Essure Microinserts.
Arthuis CJ; Simon EG; Hébert T; Marret H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 28390945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound assessment of the Essure contraceptive devices: is three-dimensional ultrasound really needed?
Paladini D; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Coppola C; Zizolfi B; Pastore G; Nappi C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 25241073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast infusion sonography to assess microinsert placement and tubal occlusion after Essure.
Connor VF
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1791-3. PubMed ID: 16650420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes in the ultrasound follow-up of the Essure micro-insert: complications and proper placement.
Thiel J; Suchet I; Tyson N; Price P
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Feb; 33(2):134-138. PubMed ID: 21352631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of the interpretation of coronal 3D ultrasound view of the uterus to evaluate the position of Essure
Capmas P; Letendre I; Levaillant JM; Fuchs F; Panel P; Chambon G; Villefranque V; Levy-Zauberman Y; Fernandez H
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 46(7):571-573. PubMed ID: 28676451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tubal perforation by Essure: three different clinical presentations.
Langenveld J; Veersema S; Bongers MY; Koks CA
Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):2011.e5-10. PubMed ID: 18692813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Pilot Study Comparing 2- and 3-dimensional Ultrasound Imaging for Confirmation of Essure Fallopian Tube Pregnancy Prevention Implants.
Godfroy M; Lopes P; Le Vaillant C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1117-1124. PubMed ID: 30428382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A kink is not always a perforation: assessing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization placement.
Borley J; Shabajee N; Tan TL
Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2429.e15-7. PubMed ID: 21367412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incorrect position of Essure microinserts 3 months after successful bilateral placement.
Gerritse MB; Veersema S; Timmermans A; Brölmann HA
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):930.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18945426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D ultrasound to assess the position of tubal sterilization microinserts.
Legendre G; Levaillant JM; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Gervaise A; Fernandez H
Hum Reprod; 2011 Oct; 26(10):2683-9. PubMed ID: 21846730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Essure microinsert imaging: does abnormal shape on ultrasound predict complications on HSG?
VanBuren WM; Suchet IB; Thiel JA; Karreman E
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Dec; 41(12):2350-2358. PubMed ID: 27022912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hysteroscopic Sterilization Device Follow-Up Rate: Hysterosalpingogram Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Jeirath N; Basinski CM; Hammond MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 29289623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discordant relationship between Essure microinsert position and tubal occlusion.
Hou MY
BMJ Case Rep; 2016 Jul; 2016():. PubMed ID: 27466315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of tubal patency after essure placement.
Rodriguez AM; Kilic GS; Vu TP; Kuo YF; Breitkopf D; Snyder RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 23541247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography for Assessment of the Efficacy of Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
Rosič M; Žegura B; Vadnjal Đonlagić S
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1929-1935. PubMed ID: 29344973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Essure Permanent Birth Control, Effectiveness and Safety: An Italian 11-Year Survey.
Franchini M; Zizolfi B; Coppola C; Bergamini V; Bonin C; Borsellino G; Busato E; Calabrese S; Calzolari S; Fantin GP; Giarrè G; Litta P; Luerti M; Mangino FP; Marchino GL; Molinari MA; Scatena E; Scrimin F; Telloli P; Di Spiezio Sardo A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):640-645. PubMed ID: 28232037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical aspects of removal of Essure microinsert.
Albright CM; Frishman GN; Bhagavath B
Contraception; 2013 Sep; 88(3):334-6. PubMed ID: 23290426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
