122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16085189)
1. Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies require study by study examination: first for heterogeneity, and then for sources of heterogeneity.
Begg CB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):865-6. PubMed ID: 16085189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed.
Deeks JJ; Macaskill P; Irwig L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):882-93. PubMed ID: 16085191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis of method comparison studies.
Williamson PR; Lancaster GA; Craig JV; Smyth RL
Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(14):2013-25. PubMed ID: 12111884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I
Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis.
Rosenberg MS
Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):464-8. PubMed ID: 15807430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data.
Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metaanalyses are observational studies: how lack of randomization impacts analysis.
Kaizar EE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1233-6. PubMed ID: 15929750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to read a review paper.
Callcut RA; Branson RD
Respir Care; 2009 Oct; 54(10):1379-85. PubMed ID: 19796419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gynaecologists blaze the trail in primary studies and systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Johnson NP; Khan KS
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Feb; 49(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 19281584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Application of Stata software to test heterogeneity in meta-analysis method].
Wang D; Mou ZY; Zhai JX; Zong HX; Zhao XD
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 29(7):726-9. PubMed ID: 19031771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
Finckh A; Tramèr MR
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?
Machan C; Ammenwerth E; Bodner T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():957-62. PubMed ID: 17108634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Basic meta-analysis: conceptualization and computation.
Verhulst SJ; Colliver JA
J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2009 Feb; 30(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 19218849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.
Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S
Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
