These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16086080)

  • 1. Identification of mislabeled specimen by molecular methods: case report and review.
    Mariappan MR; Zehnder J; Arber DA; Lay M; Fadare O; Schrijver I
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2005 Jul; 13(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 16086080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The changing spectrum of DNA-based specimen provenance testing in surgical pathology.
    Pfeifer JD; Zehnbauer B; Payton J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Jan; 135(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 21173135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of amended reports to evaluate and improve surgical pathology processes.
    Meier FA; Varney RC; Zarbo RJ
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Sep; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 21841408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of tissue contamination by polymorphic deletion probe fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Chiang S; Yip S; Betensky RA; Batten JM; Misdraji J; John Iafrate A
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Oct; 36(10):1464-71. PubMed ID: 22982889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molecular confirmation of pathological specimen integrity in Australasia.
    Bell CG; Wood DR; Cheong SJ; Kwan E; Sinosich M; Delprado W; Baumgart KW
    Pathology; 2009; 41(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 19291541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of forensic identity testing in a clinical setting. Specimen identification.
    Tsongalis GJ; Berman MM
    Diagn Mol Pathol; 1997 Apr; 6(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 9098650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rate of occult specimen provenance complications in routine clinical practice.
    Pfeifer JD; Liu J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 139(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 23270904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misidentification in laboratory medicine and diagnostic process: a neglected problem calling for action.
    Toccafondi G; Tartaglia R; Balboni F; Tomei A; Pasquini V; Pezzati P
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Jul; 54(7):e181-2. PubMed ID: 26562039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine.
    Valenstein PN; Sirota RL
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):979-96, vii. PubMed ID: 15555752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk investigations involving genetic identification.
    Wenk RE
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1999; 19(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 10538004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone grossing techniques: helpful hints and procedures.
    Dimenstein IB
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 18486895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mislabeling of cases, specimens, blocks, and slides: a college of american pathologists study of 136 institutions.
    Nakhleh RE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Meier FA; Bekeris LG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Aug; 135(8):969-74. PubMed ID: 21809987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Specimen misidentification in pathology laboratory: trends and measures].
    Minato H; Fukushima M; Nojima T; Nakano M
    Rinsho Byori; 2013 Aug; 61(8):751-9. PubMed ID: 24218776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care.
    Makary MA; Epstein J; Pronovost PJ; Millman EA; Hartmann EC; Freischlag JA
    Surgery; 2007 Apr; 141(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 17383521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causes, consequences, detection, and prevention of identification errors in laboratory diagnostics.
    Lippi G; Blanckaert N; Bonini P; Green S; Kitchen S; Palicka V; Vassault AJ; Mattiuzzi C; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 19099525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing and pilot testing practical measures of preanalytic surgical specimen identification defects.
    Bixenstine PJ; Zarbo RJ; Holzmueller CG; Yenokyan G; Robinson R; Hudson DW; Prescott AM; Hubble R; Murphy MM; George CT; D'Angelo R; Watson SR; Lubomski LH; Berenholtz SM
    Am J Med Qual; 2013; 28(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 23322909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The challenge and importance of standardizing pre-analytical variables in surgical pathology specimens for clinical care and translational research.
    Hicks DG; Boyce BF
    Biotech Histochem; 2012 Jan; 87(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 21732745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Number of levels needed for diagnosis of cervical biopsies.
    Luo YV; Prihoda TJ; Sharkey FE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2002 Oct; 126(10):1205-8. PubMed ID: 12296760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying cross contaminants and specimen mix-ups in surgical pathology.
    Hunt JL
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2008 Jul; 15(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 18580097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specimen collection and storage for diagnostic molecular pathology investigation.
    Farkas DH; Kaul KL; Wiedbrauk DL; Kiechle FL
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jun; 120(6):591-6. PubMed ID: 8651865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.