219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16086469)
1. Legal and policy implications of recent advances in prenatal diagnosis and fetal therapy.
Hubbard R
Womens Rights Law Report; 1982; 7(3):201-18. PubMed ID: 16086469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict.
Hyams R
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconciling fetal/maternal conflicts.
Kim RH
Ida Law Rev; 1990-1991; 27(2):223-48. PubMed ID: 16032814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reply to Sarah Burns.
Colker R
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
Warren MA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A maternal duty to protect fetal health?
Weinberg SR
Indiana Law J; 1983; 58(3):531-46. PubMed ID: 16211746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns.
Shultz MM
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal-fetal conflict and in utero fetal therapy.
Steinbock B
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):781-93. PubMed ID: 11652864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Delicate balance: the emerging issue of maternal-fetal conflict.
Allegretti J
America (NY); 1991 Mar; 164(8):238-9,249-50. PubMed ID: 16144134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Maternal duties during pregnancy: toward a conceptual framework.
Sterns ML
New Engl Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(3):595-634. PubMed ID: 16998992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women: the balancing of maternal and fetal rights.
Harris P
Clevel State Law Rev; 2001; 49(1):133-61. PubMed ID: 15212015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When parental autonomy clashes with a child's interest in the advances of science: the case for the future of court-ordered gene therapy.
Applebaum AR
Wayne Law Rev; 2003; 48(4):1543-59. PubMed ID: 15568245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A realistic approach to maternal-fetal conflict.
Hornstra D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 11656772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pregnant embodiment and women's autonomy rights in law: an analysis of the language and politics of Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. D.F.G.
Randall M
Sask Law Rev; 1999; 62(2):515-42. PubMed ID: 12769105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
Gallagher A
St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal needs, physicians' duties.
Mattingly SS
Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 16127865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The "Seymour Report" on Fetal Welfare and the Law in Australia.
Marks LA
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E2. PubMed ID: 16900612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal interests vs. maternal rights: is the state going too far?
Trindel RM
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):743-62. PubMed ID: 16273672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Drawing lines: the abortion perplex and the presuppositions of applied ethics.
Weston A
Monist; 1984 Oct; 67():589-604. PubMed ID: 16100833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Raising questions about society's "duty to rescue" the unborn.
Suziedelis AK
Health Care Ethics USA; 2004; 12(1):E3. PubMed ID: 15685768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
