681 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16086474)
1. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
Smith PA
Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
Bertz RC
West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
Reilly EA
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution.
Tweedt DE
Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HIPAA, Privacy, and Reproductive Rights in a Post-Roe Era.
Shachar C
JAMA; 2022 Aug; 328(5):417-418. PubMed ID: 35838680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights.
Schehr AR
Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
Gallagher A
St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Contraception or incarceration: what's wrong with this picture?
Callahan J
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995-1996 Winter; 7(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16086509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The fragility of the US Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade].
Merchant J
Med Sci (Paris); 2006; 22(8-9):773-5. PubMed ID: 16962056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion as liberty and right.
Hobin TJ
Hum Life Rev; 2005; 31(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 16320459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. roe v. Wade: the right of privacy revisited.
Wheeler LA; Kovar SL
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1973; 21(4):527-48. PubMed ID: 11663470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade.
Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S
Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
Kendall CC
John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond personhood and autonomy: moral theory and the premises of privacy.
Rappaport AJ
Utah Law Rev; 2001; 2001(2):441-507. PubMed ID: 16538746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.
Cohen IG; Reingold RB; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
Pachman TS
Columbia J Gend Law; 2003; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The putative father's rights after Roe v. Wade.
Tapovatz WE
St Marys Law J; 1974; 6(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 11663502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Whose right to life? Implications of Roe v. Wade.
Cane MB
Fam Law Q; 1973; 7(4):413-32. PubMed ID: 11663407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
