These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16086476)

  • 21. Ulysses and the fate of frozen embryos--reproduction, research, or destruction?
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(5):373-6. PubMed ID: 10922428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Baby contracts.
    Kwok CS
    Yale Law J; 2001 May; 110(7):1287-94. PubMed ID: 12741373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. No use of stored embryos without consent.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Sep; (191):5-6. PubMed ID: 16208789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro fertilization and consent agreements: where does California stand?
    Ellis M
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 2002; 42(4):1191-225. PubMed ID: 15212074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Family law conundrums in assisted reproduction.
    Waldman EA
    Whittier Law Rev; 1999; 21(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 12199239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Navigating the slippery slope of frozen embryo disputes: the case for a contractual approach.
    Fleming NA
    Temple Law Rev; 2002; 75(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 15156893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Roe and the new frontier.
    Roy LS
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 2003; 27(1):339-83. PubMed ID: 15568255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assisted reproductive technology law. Obtaining informed consent for the commercial cryopreservation of embryos.
    Vukadinovich DM
    J Leg Med; 2000 Mar; 21(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 10730012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Court says woman can bar embryos' use.
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():B6. PubMed ID: 12155241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dealing with cryopreserved embryos upon divorce: a contractual approach aimed at preserving party expectations.
    Petersen SD
    UCLA Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 50(4):1065-93. PubMed ID: 15378819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
    Sheinbach DM
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. From a to z: analysis of Massachusetts' approach to the enforceability of cryopreserved pre-embryo dispositional agreements.
    Kaplan S
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 81(5):1093-118. PubMed ID: 12715818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Post-Dobbs legal conundrums surrounding preimplantation in vitro fertilization embryo dispositions.
    Crockin S; Altman AB; Rinehart L
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Jan; 119(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 36494203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Davis dilemma: how to prevent battles over frozen preembryos.
    Panitch AR
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1991; 41(2):543-79. PubMed ID: 16127877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use and disposal of stored embryos.
    Dickens BM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 134(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 27177517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Law 25/2003, of 21 November, modifying Law 35/1988, of 22 November, concerning assisted reproduction techniques].
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):255-66. PubMed ID: 15032108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. British women lose court fight over possessing frozen embryos.
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A5. PubMed ID: 14526820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Precommitment stategies [sic] for disposition of frozen embryos.
    Robertson JA
    Emory Law J; 2001; 50(4):989-1046. PubMed ID: 12956135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Seeking a better solution for the disposition of frozen embryos: is embryo adoption the answer?
    Redman PC; Redman LF
    Tulsa Law J; 2000; 35(3-4):583-98. PubMed ID: 16273678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
    Pachman TS
    Columbia J Gend Law; 2003; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.