169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16086477)
1. Assisted suicide and the competent terminally ill: on ordinary treatments and extraordinary policies.
Strasser M
Oregon Law Rev; 1995; 74():539-609. PubMed ID: 16086477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Deciding life and death in the courtroom. From Quinlan to Cruzan, Glucksberg, and Vacco--a brief history and analysis of constitutional protection of the 'right to die'.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(18):1523-8. PubMed ID: 9363974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The "right to die": on drawing (and erasing) lines.
Kamisar Y
Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):481-521. PubMed ID: 12385319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to assisted suicide in Washington and Oregon: the courts won't allow a northwest passage.
Kline RL
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1996; 5(2):213-37. PubMed ID: 16086524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
Davidson SI
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician-assisted suicide: three crucial distinctions.
Spritz N
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):869-80. PubMed ID: 12455517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Is there a right to physician-assisted suicide?
Bleich JD
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):795-815. PubMed ID: 12455512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assisted suicide: still a wonderful life?
Chopko ME; Moses MF
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1995; 70(3):519-80. PubMed ID: 11656588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections.
Kadish SH
Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court and terminal sedation: rejecting assisted suicide, embracing euthanasia.
Orentlicher D
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):947-68. PubMed ID: 11657288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to die with dignity with the assistance of a physician: an Anglo, American and Australian international perspective.
Woods E
ILSA J Int Law; 1998; 4(2):817-34. PubMed ID: 12236256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to die.
Sunstein CR
Yale Law J; 1997 Jan; 106(4):1123-63. PubMed ID: 11656791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Who decides if there is "triumph in the ultimate agony?" Constitutional theory and the emerging right to die with dignity.
Goebel BC
William Mary Law Rev; 1996; 37(2):827-901. PubMed ID: 12173637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Peters PG
Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The bell tolls for a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(15):1098-1103. PubMed ID: 9321541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Supreme Court and physician-assisted suicide--the ultimate right.
Angell M
N Engl J Med; 1997 Jan; 336(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 8970940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Responsible public policy at the end of life.
Chopko ME
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1998; 75(3):557-94. PubMed ID: 12627572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reading the mystery passage narrowly: a legal, ethical and practical argument against physician assisted suicide.
Hickey MB
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):567-603. PubMed ID: 12755094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Active euthanasia: can it be justified?
Molenda FA
Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live".
Kamisar Y
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
