These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16086480)

  • 1. The application of traditional criminal law to misappropriation of gametic materials.
    Ayala K
    Am J Crim Law; 1997; 24(3):503-39. PubMed ID: 16086480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical dilemmas in reproductive medicine.
    Paine SJ; Moore PK; Hill DL
    Whittier Law Rev; 1996; 18(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 16273701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Donate a definition.
    Herder M
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15739316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misappropriation of human eggs and embryos and the tort of conversion: a relational view.
    Fischer JD
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 32(2):381-429. PubMed ID: 12455505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
    Sheinbach DM
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moore 10 years later--still trying to fill the gap: creating a personal property right in genetic material.
    Seeney EB
    New Engl Law Rev; 1998; 32(4):1131-91. PubMed ID: 12778925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The "embryo" wars: at the epicenter of science, law, religion, and politics.
    Crockin SL
    Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):599-632. PubMed ID: 16610149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo.
    Cuva AJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seeking a better solution for the disposition of frozen embryos: is embryo adoption the answer?
    Redman PC; Redman LF
    Tulsa Law J; 2000; 35(3-4):583-98. PubMed ID: 16273678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regulating reproductive technologies: panacea or paper tiger?
    Daar JF
    Houst Law Rev; 1997; 34(3):609-64. PubMed ID: 12680374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Growing pains: disputes surrounding human reproductive interests stretch the boundaries of traditional legal concepts.
    Triber GA
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 12755156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Law for protection of embryos.
    Germany
    Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disputing over embryos: of contracts and consents.
    Waldman EA
    Ariz State Law J; 2000; 32(3):897-940. PubMed ID: 12769122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Navigating the slippery slope of frozen embryo disputes: the case for a contractual approach.
    Fleming NA
    Temple Law Rev; 2002; 75(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 15156893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology.
    Katz GA
    Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 12731553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sperm, egg, and a petri dish. Unveiling the underlying property issues surrounding cryopreserved embryos.
    Langley LS; Blackston JW
    J Leg Med; 2006 Jun; 27(2):167-206. PubMed ID: 16728352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro fertilization and consent agreements: where does California stand?
    Ellis M
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 2002; 42(4):1191-225. PubMed ID: 15212074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unauthorized embryo transfer at the University of California, Irvine Center for Reproductive Health.
    Kakkar S
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):1015-33. PubMed ID: 11657284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No use of stored embryos without consent.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Sep; (191):5-6. PubMed ID: 16208789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Excess embryos: is embryo adoption a new solution or a temporary fix?
    Johnson ND
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 2003; 68(3):853-83. PubMed ID: 15237519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.