306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16086510)
1. Assisted suicide: the state versus the people.
Safranek JP; Safranek SJ
Seattle Univ Law Rev; 1997; 21(2):261-79. PubMed ID: 16086510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can the right to autonomy be resuscitated after Glucksberg?
Safranek JP; Safranek SJ
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1998; 69(3):731-57. PubMed ID: 16086508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex, death, and the courts: Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington; Quill v. Vacco; Romer v. Evans.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1996 Aug; 46(13):44-50. PubMed ID: 11656512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to die.
Sunstein CR
Yale Law J; 1997 Jan; 106(4):1123-63. PubMed ID: 11656791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to die and the jurisprudence of tradition.
McConnell MW
Utah Law Rev; 1997; 665(3):665-708. PubMed ID: 11657527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician assisted suicide: its challenge to the prevailing constitutional paradigm.
Robinson JH
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1995; 9(2):345-66. PubMed ID: 11652999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of courts in the debate on assisted suicide: a communitarian approach.
Beschle DL
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1995; 9(2):367-405. PubMed ID: 11653000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The quiet battle for the heart of liberty--a victory for the cautious: Washington v. Glucksberg, 117 S. Ct. 2258 (1997).
Melchoir JA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1998; 66(4):1359-86. PubMed ID: 16211745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Brief asks reversal of assisted-suicide ruling.
; ; ;
Origins; 1994 Sep; 24(12):214-22. PubMed ID: 11652894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Ninth Circuit's fatal overreach.
First Things; 1996 May; 63():12-3. PubMed ID: 11654350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to assisted suicide in Washington and Oregon: the courts won't allow a northwest passage.
Kline RL
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1996; 5(2):213-37. PubMed ID: 16086524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Give me liberty and give me death: assisted suicide as a fundamental liberty interest.
Kline RL
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1997; 6(2):527-50. PubMed ID: 16485372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Who decides if there is "triumph in the ultimate agony?" Constitutional theory and the emerging right to die with dignity.
Goebel BC
William Mary Law Rev; 1996; 37(2):827-901. PubMed ID: 12173637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
Davidson SI
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assisted suicide and reproductive freedom: exploring some connections.
Appleton SF
Wash Univ Law Q; 1998; 76(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 11657576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Death with dignity in Montana.
Dallner JE; Manning DS
Mont Law Rev; 2004; 65(1):309-41. PubMed ID: 16180295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide.
Gaumer CP; Griffith PR
S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Private uses of lethal force: the case of assisted suicide.
Hittinger R
Loyola Law Rev; 1997; 43(2):151-79. PubMed ID: 16200696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. High court to say if the dying have a right to suicide help.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1996 Oct; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 11647126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pragmatism in the face of death: the role of facts in the assisted suicide debate.
Wolf SM
Minn Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 82(4):1063-101. PubMed ID: 11865913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
