691 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16086514)
1. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome.
Brindisi TJ
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Terri Schiavo--a tragedy compounded.
Quill TE
N Engl J Med; 2005 Apr; 352(16):1630-3. PubMed ID: 15784658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law.
Goldmeier KE
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. "Culture of life" politics at the bedside--the case of Terri Schiavo.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2005 Apr; 352(16):1710-5. PubMed ID: 15784657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
O'Brien EJ
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
New Jersey
N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.
Calder M
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
Bopp J; Avila D
Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
Roach CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
Dippel DL
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Natural death in 2003: are we slipping backwards?
Ashby M; Mendelson D
J Law Med; 2003 Feb; 10(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 12649994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy.
Adamson EH
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1990; 17(2):461-92. PubMed ID: 16047420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Exercising the right to die: a proposal for New York.
Caffera SM
Syracuse Law Rev; 1991; 42(4):1189-240. PubMed ID: 16130264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Indiana's new health care consent act: a guiding light for the health care provider.
Thompson WH
Indiana Law Rev; 1988; 21(1):181-203. PubMed ID: 11659030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives.
Zinberg JM
Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Maryland Health Care Decisions Act: achieving the right balance?
Hoffman DE
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1064-130. PubMed ID: 12599347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.
Hunt WE
Mont Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
Mayo TW
MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
