These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
678 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16086519)
1. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors. O'Shaughnessy M Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court. Bertz RC West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution. Hayhurst MB Mont Law Rev; 1997; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors. Scuder AC Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Misconceived laws: the irrationality of parental involvement requirements for contraception. Arons JR William Mary Law Rev; 2000 Mar; 41(3):1093-131. PubMed ID: 16329212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative. Green W Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions? Ezzard MM Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions. Weissmann R Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents. Ehrlich JS Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases. Guggenheim M Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Whither the family and family privacy? Jones TR; Peterman L Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):193-236. PubMed ID: 15706723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II. Graziano SG Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique. Embree MG; Dobson TA Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care. Bertuglia J Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Right to abortion limited: the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of parental notification statutes. Byrne TJ Loyola Law Rev; 1982; 28(1):281-96. PubMed ID: 11658437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Joseph MA New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Parental notification and public policy. Diamond EF St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 11656615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions. Wolff MH; Hawn RH Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable. Heller S Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]