238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16086521)
1. Adding constitutional depravation to untimely death: South Dakota's living will pregnancy provision.
Matchan HE; Sheffield KE
S D Law Rev; 1992; 37(2):388-412. PubMed ID: 16086521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
Dyke MC
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
MacAvoy-Snitzer J
Columbia Law Rev; 1987 Oct; 87(6):1280-300. PubMed ID: 11652510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A time to live, a time to die.
Stiefel LS
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):699-741. PubMed ID: 16144097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Compelling pregnancy at death's door.
Taylor KA
Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The constitutionality of pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
Benton EC
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 43(6):1821-37. PubMed ID: 11656069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Advance directives: an overview of changing right-to-die laws.
Fade AE
J Nurs Law; 1995; 2(3):27-38. PubMed ID: 12545976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
O'Brien EJ
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy.
Adamson EH
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1990; 17(2):461-92. PubMed ID: 16047420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Death, privacy, and the free exercise of religion.
Stacy T
Cornell Law Rev; 1992 Mar; 77(3):490-595. PubMed ID: 10117969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives.
Horttor BJ
N D Law Rev; 1998; 74(2):233-93. PubMed ID: 16437813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Autonomy, consent, and the conflict of rights in health care.
Procaccino JA
Air Force Law Rev; 1990; 33():183-91. PubMed ID: 15991412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution.
Tweedt DE
Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.
Hunt WE
Mont Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
Bertz RC
West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Redrafting Ohio's advance directive laws.
Martyn SR; Reagan JE; Minogue B; Dippel DL; Schimer MR; Taraszewski R
Akron Law Rev; 1992; 26(2):229-92. PubMed ID: 16506326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. South Dakota's abortion script--threatening the physician-patient relationship.
Lazzarini Z
N Engl J Med; 2008 Nov; 359(21):2189-91. PubMed ID: 19020321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Maternal duties during pregnancy: toward a conceptual framework.
Sterns ML
New Engl Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(3):595-634. PubMed ID: 16998992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
