These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16086528)

  • 41. Raising the bar on achieving racial diversity in higher education: the United States Supreme Court's decision in Fisher v University of Texas.
    Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J; Scott J
    Acad Med; 2013 Dec; 88(12):1792-4. PubMed ID: 24128633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Protection of privilege recognized.
    J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 1996 Sep; 34(9):9. PubMed ID: 8880641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Definition of spouse under the Family and Medical Leave Act. Final rule.
    Wager and Hour Division, Department of Labor
    Fed Regist; 2015 Feb; 80(37):9989-10001. PubMed ID: 25898422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Lochner redeemed: family privacy after Troxel and Carhart.
    Meyer DD
    UCLA Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 48(5):1125-90. PubMed ID: 16273684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Too young to kill? U.S. Supreme Court treads a dangerous path in Roper v. Simmons.
    Sarkar SP
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 17872560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The psychotherapist-patient testimonial privilege.
    Slovenko R
    Am J Psychoanal; 1997 Mar; 57(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 9079163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Physician-patient privilege: the legal assault continues.
    McPhedran M
    CMAJ; 1996 Jun; 154(11):1760-3. PubMed ID: 8646670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Biomarkers unbound--the Supreme Court's ruling on diagnostic-test patents.
    Kesselheim AS; Karlawish J
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Jun; 366(25):2338-40. PubMed ID: 22621421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Indiana v. Davis: revisiting due process rights of permanently incompetent defendants.
    Morris DR; Parker GF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19767504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd: implications of the supreme court's decision for the people who matter most...the consumer.
    Jaquette I
    Am J Law Med; 2007; 33(1):97-117. PubMed ID: 17547356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Model law on confidentiality of health and social service records.
    Am J Psychiatry; 1979 Jan; 136(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 758825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. "The Timeless Explosion of Fantasy's Dream": How State Courts Have Ignored the Supreme Court's Decision in
    Perlin ML; Harmon TR; Geiger M
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):527. PubMed ID: 38449388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. "I'll give you shelter from the storm": privilege, confidentiality, and confessions of crime.
    Perlin ML
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1996 Jun; 29(4):1699-1707. PubMed ID: 12452140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sequestration of lay witnesses and experts.
    Slovenko R
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):447-50. PubMed ID: 15704631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Scope of employer, sex and transference: when is an employer liable for therapist sexual relations?
    Tabangay A
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 10141469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. ARNP supervision of fluoroscopy--considerations in light of the Iowa Supreme Court's ruling.
    Freeman J
    Iowa Med; 2013; 103(3):22. PubMed ID: 25211969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Inside the US Supreme Court's war on science.
    Tollefson J
    Nature; 2022 Sep; 609(7927):460-462. PubMed ID: 36104405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A new test for evaluating Eighth Amendment challenges to lethal injections.
    Harv Law Rev; 2007 Mar; 120(5):1301-23. PubMed ID: 17410679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The minor's limited right to confidential health care and the inverse of confidentiality: a parent's decision not to disclose illness status to a minor child.
    van Straaten J
    Child Leg Rights J; 2000; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 16493796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Public Good on the Docket - The Supreme Court's Evolving Approach to Public Health.
    Sharfstein JM; Gostin LO
    N Engl J Med; 2024 May; 390(18):1637-1639. PubMed ID: 38657241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.