BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16086849)

  • 1. Patterns of intron sequence evolution in Drosophila are dependent upon length and GC content.
    Haddrill PR; Charlesworth B; Halligan DL; Andolfatto P
    Genome Biol; 2005; 6(8):R67. PubMed ID: 16086849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patterns and rates of intron divergence between humans and chimpanzees.
    Gazave E; Marqués-Bonet T; Fernando O; Charlesworth B; Navarro A
    Genome Biol; 2007; 8(2):R21. PubMed ID: 17309804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protein polymorphism is negatively correlated with conservation of intronic sequences and complexity of expression patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Petit N; Casillas S; Ruiz A; Barbadilla A
    J Mol Evol; 2007 May; 64(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 17460807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patterns of exon-intron architecture variation of genes in eukaryotic genomes.
    Zhu L; Zhang Y; Zhang W; Yang S; Chen JQ; Tian D
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Jan; 10():47. PubMed ID: 19166620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns of evolutionary constraints in intronic and intergenic DNA of Drosophila.
    Halligan DL; Eyre-Walker A; Andolfatto P; Keightley PD
    Genome Res; 2004 Feb; 14(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 14762063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The correlation between intron length and recombination in drosophila. Dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces.
    Comeron JM; Kreitman M
    Genetics; 2000 Nov; 156(3):1175-90. PubMed ID: 11063693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intron loss and gain in Drosophila.
    Coulombe-Huntington J; Majewski J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Dec; 24(12):2842-50. PubMed ID: 17965454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrasting patterns of sequence divergence and base composition between Drosophila introns and intergenic regions.
    Ometto L; De Lorenzo D; Stephan W
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):604-7. PubMed ID: 17148300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intron length evolution in Drosophila.
    Presgraves DC
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Nov; 23(11):2203-13. PubMed ID: 16923822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intronic AT skew is a defendable proxy for germline transcription but does not predict crossing-over or protein evolution rates in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Weber CC; Hurst LD
    J Mol Evol; 2010 Dec; 71(5-6):415-26. PubMed ID: 20938653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective constraints on intron evolution in Drosophila.
    Parsch J
    Genetics; 2003 Dec; 165(4):1843-51. PubMed ID: 14704170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison.
    Halligan DL; Keightley PD
    Genome Res; 2006 Jul; 16(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 16751341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila.
    Singh ND; Arndt PF; Clark AG; Aquadro CF
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Jul; 26(7):1591-605. PubMed ID: 19351792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila.
    Andolfatto P
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7062):1149-52. PubMed ID: 16237443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative genomics of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster.
    Jabbari K; Bernardi G
    Gene; 2004 May; 333():183-6. PubMed ID: 15177694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for a force favoring GC over AT at short intronic sites in Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster.
    Jackson B; Charlesworth B
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34544137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patterns of DNA-sequence divergence between Drosophila miranda and D. pseudoobscura.
    Marion de Procé S; Halligan DL; Keightley PD; Charlesworth B
    J Mol Evol; 2009 Dec; 69(6):601-11. PubMed ID: 19859648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patterns of selective constraints in noncoding DNA of rice.
    Guo X; Wang Y; Keightley PD; Fan L
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 7():208. PubMed ID: 17976238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of divergence time and recombination rate on molecular evolution of Drosophila INE-1 transposable elements and other candidates for neutrally evolving sites.
    Wang J; Keightley PD; Halligan DL
    J Mol Evol; 2007 Dec; 65(6):627-39. PubMed ID: 17896069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila.
    Akashi H; Kliman RM; Eyre-Walker A
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):49-60. PubMed ID: 9720271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.