662 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16087091)
1. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multimodality computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI.
Yuan Y; Giger ML; Li H; Bhooshan N; Sennett CA
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1158-67. PubMed ID: 20692620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Combination of mammography with automated ultrasound (Sono-X) in routine diagnosis?].
Richter K; Winzer KJ; Frohberg HD; Guski H; Prihoda H; Schmitt HJ; Hamm B
Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 5():37-41. PubMed ID: 10063570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of breast cancer using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: Comparison of a Monte Carlo versus partial least squares analysis based feature extraction technique.
Zhu C; Palmer GM; Breslin TM; Harter J; Ramanujam N
Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Aug; 38(7):714-24. PubMed ID: 16799981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
Schnall MD; Blume J; Bluemke DA; DeAngelis GA; DeBruhl N; Harms S; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hylton N; Kuhl CK; Pisano ED; Causer P; Schnitt SJ; Thickman D; Stelling CB; Weatherall PT; Lehman C; Gatsonis CA
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 16373758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset.
Li H; Giger ML; Yuan Y; Chen W; Horsch K; Lan L; Jamieson AR; Sennett CA; Jansen SA
Acad Radiol; 2008 Nov; 15(11):1437-45. PubMed ID: 18995194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided diagnosis with temporal analysis to improve radiologists' interpretation of mammographic mass lesions.
Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2010 May; 14(3):803-8. PubMed ID: 20403792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system.
Meinel LA; Stolpen AH; Berbaum KS; Fajardo LL; Reinhardt JM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 17154399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Wu Y; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA; Metz CE
Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 8451441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U; Newstead GM
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87. PubMed ID: 16964864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrimination of MR images of breast masses with fractal-interpolation function models.
Penn AI; Bolinger L; Schnall MD; Loew MH
Acad Radiol; 1999 Mar; 6(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 10898034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computerized analysis of lesions in US images of the breast.
Giger ML; Al-Hallaq H; Huo Z; Moran C; Wolverton DE; Chan CW; Zhong W
Acad Radiol; 1999 Nov; 6(11):665-74. PubMed ID: 10894069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
