These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16087466)

  • 1. Transit bus operator performance and attitudes toward a collision warning system: results of a simulator experiment.
    Reinach SJ; Everson JH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Sep; 6(3):248-57. PubMed ID: 16087466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation into the effect of an intersection crash warning system on driving performance in a simulator.
    Chen H; Cao L; Logan DB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Oct; 12(5):529-37. PubMed ID: 21972864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Traffic calming along rural highways crossing small urban communities: driving simulator experiment.
    Galante F; Mauriello F; Montella A; Pernetti M; Aria M; D'Ambrosio A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1585-94. PubMed ID: 20728607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of experience and electronic stability control on low friction collision avoidance in a truck driving simulator.
    Markkula G; Benderius O; Wolff K; Wahde M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1266-77. PubMed ID: 23122327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving.
    Kramer AF; Cassavaugh N; Horrey WJ; Becic E; Mayhugh JL
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):935-49. PubMed ID: 17915608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulator driving performance predicts accident reports five years later.
    Hoffman L; McDowd JM
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):741-5. PubMed ID: 20853979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new class of auditory warning signals for complex systems: auditory icons.
    Belz SM; Robinson GS; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):608-18. PubMed ID: 10774131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preferred time headway in car-following and individual differences in perceptual-motor skills.
    van Winsum W
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):863-73. PubMed ID: 9885050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Commentary training improves responsiveness to hazards in a driving simulator.
    Crundall D; Andrews B; van Loon E; Chapman P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):2117-24. PubMed ID: 20728670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychomotor disturbance in depression: assessment using a driving simulator paradigm.
    Bulmash EL; Moller HJ; Kayumov L; Shen J; Wang X; Shapiro CM
    J Affect Disord; 2006 Jul; 93(1-3):213-8. PubMed ID: 16522332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of in-vehicle tasks and time-gap selection while reclaiming control from adaptive cruise control (ACC) with bus simulator.
    Lin TW; Hwang SL; Su JM; Chen WH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):1164-70. PubMed ID: 18460385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures.
    Yan X; Abdel-Aty M; Radwan E; Wang X; Chilakapati P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):274-88. PubMed ID: 18215559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of bus collision and non-collision incidents using transit ITS and other archived operations data.
    Strathman JG; Wachana P; Callas S
    J Safety Res; 2010 Apr; 41(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 20497799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method for evaluating collision avoidance systems using naturalistic driving data.
    McLaughlin SB; Hankey JM; Dingus TA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 18215527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of distraction and driving context on driver response to imperfect collision warning systems.
    Lees MN; Lee JD
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1264-86. PubMed ID: 17558669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving.
    Bliss JP; Acton SA
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):499-509. PubMed ID: 14559409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system.
    Itoh M; Horikome T; Inagaki T
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):756-63. PubMed ID: 23453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of perceptual treatments on driver's behavior: from driving simulator studies to field tests--first results.
    Auberlet JM; Rosey F; Anceaux F; Aubin S; Briand P; Pacaux MP; Plainchault P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():91-8. PubMed ID: 22269489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.