These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16088883)
21. Accuracy and repeatability of fourier velocity encoded M-mode and two-dimensional cine phase contrast for pulse wave velocity measurement in the descending aorta. Taviani V; Patterson AJ; Graves MJ; Hardy CJ; Worters P; Sutcliffe MP; Gillard JH J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1185-94. PubMed ID: 20432355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Estimation of pressure gradients in pulsatile flow from magnetic resonance acceleration measurements. Tasu JP; Mousseaux E; Delouche A; Oddou C; Jolivet O; Bittoun J Magn Reson Med; 2000 Jul; 44(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 10893523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new method for blood velocity measurements using ultrasound FMCW signals. Kunita M; Sudo M; Inoue S; Akahane M IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 May; 57(5):1064-76. PubMed ID: 20442017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Measurement accuracy of the flow velocity in pulsed ultrasound Doppler velocimeter. Kagiyama M; Ogasawara Y; Tadaoka S; Kajiya F Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 25(8):1265-74. PubMed ID: 10576269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Rapid mapping of flow velocity using a new PARSE method. Zuo J; Walsh EG; Deutsch G; Twieg DB Magn Reson Med; 2006 Jan; 55(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 16315204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Power Doppler US: evaluation of the morphology of stenoses with a flow phantom. Claudon M; Winninger D; Briançon S; Pesque P Radiology; 2001 Jan; 218(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 11152788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler ultrasound for high flow velocity measurements. Matre K; Ersland L; Larsen TH; Andersen E Scand Cardiovasc J; 2002 May; 36(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 12079639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Velocity profiles in stenosed models using magnetic resonance imaging. Rittgers SE; Fei DY; Kraft KA; Fatouros PP Monogr Atheroscler; 1990; 15():43-53. PubMed ID: 2136929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of the effect of vessel curvature on Doppler measurements in steady flow. Balbis S; Guiot C; Roatta S; Arina R; Todros T Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 May; 30(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 15183230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Regularization of flow streamlines in multislice phase-contrast MR imaging. Fatouraee N; Amini AA IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jun; 22(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 12872945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Measurement of mean velocity during pulsatile flow using time-averaged maximum frequency of Doppler ultrasound waveforms. Li S; Hoskins PR; Anderson T; McDicken WN Ultrasound Med Biol; 1993; 19(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 8516956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. Petersson S; Dyverfeldt P; Sigfridsson A; Lantz J; Carlhäll CJ; Ebbers T Magn Reson Med; 2016 Mar; 75(3):1249-55. PubMed ID: 25846511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Measurement of aortic blood flow with MR imaging: comparative study with Doppler US. Matsuda T; Shimizu K; Sakurai T; Fujita A; Ohara H; Okamura S; Hashimoto S; Tamaki S; Kawai C Radiology; 1987 Mar; 162(3):857-61. PubMed ID: 3544040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Human factors as a source of error in peak Doppler velocity measurement. Lui EY; Steinman AH; Cobbold RS; Johnston KW J Vasc Surg; 2005 Nov; 42(5):972-9. PubMed ID: 16275456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]