These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16089622)

  • 21. No evidence of magnitude clustering in an aftershock sequence of nano- and picoseismicity.
    Davidsen J; Kwiatek G; Dresen G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Jan; 108(3):038501. PubMed ID: 22400793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. No Significant Effect of Coulomb Stress on the Gutenberg-Richter Law after the Landers Earthquake.
    Navas-Portella V; Jiménez A; Corral Á
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2901. PubMed ID: 32075986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scale-free networks of earthquakes and aftershocks.
    Baiesi M; Paczuski M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Jun; 69(6 Pt 2):066106. PubMed ID: 15244666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress.
    Felzer KR; Brodsky EE
    Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7094):735-8. PubMed ID: 16760974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "Universal" distribution of interearthquake times explained.
    Saichev A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Aug; 97(7):078501. PubMed ID: 17026277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The debate on the prognostic value of earthquake foreshocks: a meta-analysis.
    Mignan A
    Sci Rep; 2014 Feb; 4():4099. PubMed ID: 24526224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks.
    Chen X; Nakata N; Pennington C; Haffener J; Chang JC; He X; Zhan Z; Ni S; Walter JI
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4945. PubMed ID: 28694472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistical physics models for aftershocks and induced seismicity.
    Luginbuhl M; Rundle JB; Turcotte DL
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2018 Nov; 377(2136):. PubMed ID: 30478209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks and aftershocks.
    Gulia L; Wiemer S
    Nature; 2019 Oct; 574(7777):193-199. PubMed ID: 31597971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Realistic spatial and temporal earthquake distributions in a modified Olami-Feder-Christensen model.
    Jagla EA
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Apr; 81(4 Pt 2):046117. PubMed ID: 20481796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Foreshock sequences and short-term earthquake predictability on East Pacific Rise transform faults.
    McGuire JJ; Boettcher MS; Jordan TH
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):457-61. PubMed ID: 15791246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Aftershocks driven by a high-pressure CO2 source at depth.
    Miller SA; Collettini C; Chiaraluce L; Cocco M; Barchi M; Kaus BJ
    Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6976):724-7. PubMed ID: 14973482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of the brittle-ductile transition zone on aftershock and foreshock occurrence.
    Petrillo G; Lippiello E; Landes FP; Rosso A
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jun; 11(1):3010. PubMed ID: 32541693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Superlinear scaling of offspring at criticality in branching processes.
    Saichev A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Jan; 89(1):012104. PubMed ID: 24580169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Continuously Sheared Granular Matter Reproduces in Detail Seismicity Laws.
    Lherminier S; Planet R; Vehel VLD; Simon G; Vanel L; Måløy KJ; Ramos O
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 May; 122(21):218501. PubMed ID: 31283309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Foreshock and aftershocks in simple earthquake models.
    Kazemian J; Tiampo KF; Klein W; Dominguez R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Feb; 114(8):088501. PubMed ID: 25768785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A probabilistic neural network for earthquake magnitude prediction.
    Adeli H; Panakkat A
    Neural Netw; 2009 Sep; 22(7):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19502005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu islands earthquake swarm that stressing rate governs seismicity.
    Toda S; Stein RS; Sagiya T
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6902):58-61. PubMed ID: 12214230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mechanism diversity of the loma prieta aftershocks and the mechanics of mainshock-aftershock interaction.
    Beroza GC; Zoback MD
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5092):210-3. PubMed ID: 17790987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Role of static stress diffusion in the spatiotemporal organization of aftershocks.
    Lippiello E; de Arcangelis L; Godano C
    Phys Rev Lett; 2009 Jul; 103(3):038501. PubMed ID: 19659324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.