These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16091710)

  • 21. Comparative study of dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques using addition silicone impression material.
    Penaflor CF; Semacio RC; De Las Alas LT; Uy HG
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 49(4):37-49. PubMed ID: 10202524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dimensional accuracy of pickup implant impression: an in vitro comparison of novel modular versus standard custom trays.
    Simeone P; Valentini PP; Pizzoferrato R; Scudieri F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):538-46. PubMed ID: 21691600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A method for the measurement of the gingival sulcus of sheep.
    Aitchison GU
    Res Vet Sci; 1979 Nov; 27(3):381-3. PubMed ID: 396620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques.
    Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ; Jekki R; Won J
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 24286645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Building the edentulous impression--a layering technique using multiple viscosities of impression material.
    Massad J; Lobel W; Garcia LT; Monarres A; Hammesfahr PD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2006 Aug; 27(8):446-51; quiz 452, 468. PubMed ID: 16955716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modified custom tray.
    Ortensi L; Strocchi ML
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 10946346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preservation of the negative image of tooth enamel with dental impression material enhances morphometric measurements of gingival overgrowth.
    Miller ML; Andringa A; Turner LT; Dalton TP; Derkenne S; Nebert DW
    Microsc Res Tech; 2003 Apr; 60(5):528-36. PubMed ID: 12619128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Studies on the use of alginate impression material and the dependence of the impression result on various conditions of processing. 3. Dimensional accuracy].
    Welker D
    Stomatol DDR; 1974 Jun; 24(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 4605968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The global impression technic in fixed dentures].
    Lamy M; Mainjot A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 16193850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of the width of gingival pocket exposure and saliva on the accuracy of silicone and agar-agar impressions.
    Posti JJ
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1973 Apr; 69(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 4586572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of the space for wash materials on sulcus depth reproduction with addition-curing silicone using two-step putty-wash technique.
    Shiozawa M; Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Iwasaki N
    Dent Mater J; 2013; 32(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 23370884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impression tray--an important factor in impression precision.
    Rehberg HJ
    Int Dent J; 1977 Jun; 27(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 328405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
    Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.