These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16091926)

  • 21. Improving detection of mild loss of retinal light increment sensitivity at the posterior pole with the microperimeter MP1.
    Bowl W; Lorenz B; Jäger M; Friedburg C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 54(7):4666-74. PubMed ID: 23716630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scanning laser densitometry and color perimetry demonstrate reduced photopigment density and sensitivity in two patients with retinal degeneration.
    Tornow RP; Stilling R; Zrenner E
    Vision Res; 1999 Oct; 39(21):3630-41. PubMed ID: 10746133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Diagnosis of retinal diseases. Comparison between multifocal ERG and fundus perimetry - a case study].
    Rohrschneider K; Bültmann S; Kiel R; Weimer P; Krastel H; Blankenagel A
    Ophthalmologe; 2002 Sep; 99(9):695-702. PubMed ID: 12219258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interdevice comparison of retinal sensitivity assessments in a healthy population: the CenterVue MAIA and the Nidek MP-3 microperimeters.
    Balasubramanian S; Uji A; Lei J; Velaga S; Nittala M; Sadda S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):109-113. PubMed ID: 28495907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fundus autofluorescence and fundus perimetry in the junctional zone of geographic atrophy in patients with age-related macular degeneration.
    Schmitz-Valckenberg S; Bültmann S; Dreyhaupt J; Bindewald A; Holz FG; Rohrschneider K
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 45(12):4470-6. PubMed ID: 15557456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Threshold-oriented suprathreshold perimetry and threshold value perimetry with the Tübigen CC Automated Perimeter. A comparative study].
    Wohlrab TM; Kreinberger H; Erb C; Stübiger N; Dorner-schandl F; Thiel HJ
    Ophthalmologe; 1998 Feb; 95(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 9545786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparative analysis of the results of microperimetry and conventional computed perimetry in health].
    Shpak AA; Kachalina GF; Pedanova EK
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2009; 125(3):31-4. PubMed ID: 19566046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Scanning laser ophthalmoscope multifocal electroretinography and microperimetry in patients with Stargardt's disease].
    Rudolph G; Kalpadakis P; Ehrt O; Berninger T; Kampik A
    Ophthalmologe; 2003 Sep; 100(9):720-6. PubMed ID: 14504897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-dimensional computer-automated threshold Amsler grid test.
    Fink W; Sadun AA
    J Biomed Opt; 2004; 9(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 14715067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Values for macular perimetry using the MP-1 microperimeter in normal subjects.
    Shah VA; Chalam KV
    Ophthalmic Res; 2009; 41(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18849636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Test-Retest Reliability of Scotopic and Mesopic Fundus-Controlled Perimetry Using a Modified MAIA (Macular Integrity Assessment) in Normal Eyes.
    Pfau M; Lindner M; Fleckenstein M; Finger RP; Rubin GS; Harmening WM; Morales MU; Holz FG; Schmitz-Valckenberg S
    Ophthalmologica; 2017; 237(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 27997924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fundus-controlled two-color dark adaptometry with the Microperimeter MP1.
    Bowl W; Stieger K; Lorenz B
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 253(6):965-72. PubMed ID: 25904295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The physics and psychophysics of microperimetry.
    Seiple W; Rosen RB; Castro-Lima V; Garcia PM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 89(8):1182-91. PubMed ID: 22820474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retinal specific measurement of dark-adapted visual function: validation of a modified microperimeter.
    Crossland MD; Luong VA; Rubin GS; Fitzke FW
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 11():5. PubMed ID: 21303544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing the Nidek MP-1 and Humphrey field analyzer in normal subjects.
    Acton JH; Bartlett NS; Greenstein VC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Nov; 88(11):1288-97. PubMed ID: 21822159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Fundus-controlled microperimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope in macular diseases].
    Schneider U; Kuck H; Inhoffen W; Kreissig I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Sep; 203(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 8264213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing Visual Fields in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa Using a Novel Microperimeter with Eye Tracking: The MP-3.
    Igarashi N; Matsuura M; Hashimoto Y; Hirasawa K; Murata H; Inoue T; Ryo O; Aihara M; Asaoka R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166666. PubMed ID: 27893769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Conventional perimetry. Part 3: Static perimetry: grid--strategy--visualisation].
    Schiefer U; Pätzold J; Wabbels B; Dannheim F
    Ophthalmologe; 2006 Feb; 103(2):149-63; quiz 164-5. PubMed ID: 16437233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual field screening with a laptop computer system.
    Bruun-Jensen J
    Optometry; 2011 Sep; 82(9):519-27. PubMed ID: 21871394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microperimetric evaluation of macula in retinopathy of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II: a case report.
    Shenoy R; McCilvenny S
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2006; 16(4):634-6. PubMed ID: 16952110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.