These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16091926)

  • 41. [Fundus-oriented perimetry. Evaluation of a new visual field examination method for detecting angioscotoma].
    Schiefer U; Stercken-Sorrenti G; Dietrich TJ; Friedrich M; Benda N
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996; 209(2-3):62-71. PubMed ID: 8992085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Static and flicker perimetry in age-related macular degeneration.
    Luu CD; Dimitrov PN; Wu Z; Ayton LN; Makeyeva G; Aung KZ; Varsamidis M; Robman L; Vingrys AJ; Guymer RH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 May; 54(5):3560-8. PubMed ID: 23620428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Evaluation of the Humphrey perimetry programs SITA Standard and SITA Fast in normal probands and patients with glaucoma].
    Nordmann JP; Brion F; Hamard P; Mouton-Chopin D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Oct; 21(8):549-54. PubMed ID: 9833219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Scanning laser entoptic perimetry for the detection of age-related macular degeneration.
    Freeman WR; El-Bradey M; Plummer DJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 122(11):1647-51. PubMed ID: 15534125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Inverse stimuli in perimetric performance reveal larger visual field defects: implications for vision restoration.
    Kasten E; Guenther T; Sabel BA
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2008; 26(4-5):355-64. PubMed ID: 18997311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stability of fixation: results of fundus-controlled examination using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
    Rohrschneider K; Becker M; Kruse FE; Fendrich T; Völcker HE
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jul; 4(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 7492929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Parallel rarebits: a novel, large-scale visual field screening method.
    Lin SR; Fijalkowski N; Lin BR; Li F; Singh K; Chang RT
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 25331077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Peripapillary fundus perimetry in eyes with glaucoma.
    Convento E; Midena E; Dorigo MT; Maritan V; Cavarzeran F; Fregona IA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Nov; 90(11):1398-403. PubMed ID: 16809380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Macular diseases--application of automated static perimetry and optical coherence tomography].
    Iijima H
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Dec; 104(12):943-59. PubMed ID: 11193945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. New perimetric threshold test algorithm with dynamic strategy and tendency oriented perimetry (TOP) in glaucomatous eyes.
    Maeda H; Nakaura M; Negi A
    Eye (Lond); 2000 Oct; 14 Pt 5():747-51. PubMed ID: 11116697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Local and diffuse changes in the nerve fiber layer in glaucoma and vascular involvement of the optic papilla. Perimetry correlates].
    Stürmer J; Gloor B
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 2272574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Blue-on-yellow perimetry with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope: small alterations in the central macula with aging.
    Remky A; Elsner AE; Morandi AJ; Beausencourt E; Trempe CL
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Jul; 18(7):1425-36. PubMed ID: 11444532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Conventional techniques of visual field examination: part 4 Static perimetry: interpretation--perimetric indices--follow-up--perimetry in childhood].
    Schiefer U; Pätzold J; Wabbels B; Dannheim F
    Ophthalmologe; 2006 Mar; 103(3):235-54. quiz 255-6. PubMed ID: 16496107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Inter-device comparison of retinal sensitivity measurements: the CenterVue MAIA and the Nidek MP-1.
    Wong EN; Mackey DA; Morgan WH; Chen FK
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016; 44(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 26285157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Normative data for macular perimetry using the MP-3 microperimeter in healthy individuals.
    Rodrigues Neto TDS; Silva Neto EDD; Higashi AH; Megnis BP; Haddad MAO; Monteiro MLR; Zacharias LC
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37018820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Blue on yellow perimetry with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in patients with age related macular disease.
    Remky A; Elsner AE
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Apr; 89(4):464-9. PubMed ID: 15774925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Topography of the frequency doubling perimetry visual field compared with that of short wavelength and achromatic automated perimetry visual fields.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16361671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.