These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16092030)

  • 1. Making the case for sexual pain: let's not throw out the baby with the bath water.
    Payne K
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):46-8, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dyspareunia Looks Sexy on First But How Much Pain Will It Take for It to Score? A Reply to My Critics Concerning the DSM Classification of Dyspareunia as a Sexual Dysfunction.
    Binik YM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 15772769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should dyspareunia be retained as a sexual dysfunction in DSM-V? A painful classification decision.
    Binik YM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 15772767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Teasing apart the pain from the sex: is the pendulum swinging too far?
    Meana M
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):42-4, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer commentaries on Binik (2005).
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):23-61. PubMed ID: 15772768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dyspareunia: another argument for removal.
    Moser C
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):44-6, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pain or sex?: choosing the best option.
    Townsend JM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):51-2, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A rose by any other name: should dyspareunia be reclassified?
    Strassberg DS
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):48-9, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adding insult to injury: the classification of dyspareunia as a sexual dysfunction in the DSM.
    Kleinplatz PJ
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):36-8, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Weighing the pro's and con's of reclassifying dyspareunia.
    First MB
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):30-2, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A slightly different idea.
    Levine SB
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):38-9, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The DSM diagnostic criteria for dyspareunia.
    Binik YM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Apr; 39(2):292-303. PubMed ID: 19830537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A more radical proposal: dyspareunia is not a mental disorder.
    Spitzer RL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):48, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Management of female sexual pain disorders.
    Boyer SC; Goldfinger C; Thibault-Gagnon S; Pukall CF
    Adv Psychosom Med; 2011; 31():83-104. PubMed ID: 22005206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dyspareunia: a pain disorder or sexual dysfunction?
    Markos AR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):39-41, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual dysfunction or pain disorder?: dyspareunia from the perspective of the harmful dysfunction analysis.
    Wakefield JC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):52-7, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revisiting the diagnosis of dyspareunia: a painful but important discussion.
    Masheb R; Richman S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):41-2, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dyspareunia and DSM: a gynecologist's opinion.
    Dennerstein G
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):28, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why deny dyspareunia its sexual meaning?
    Graziottin A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):32-4, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dyspareunia is the only valid sexual dysfunction and certainly the only important one.
    Tiefer L
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):49-51, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.