These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16092544)

  • 41. Low-frequency otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren measured by two commercial devices.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Piotrowska A; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 77(10):1724-8. PubMed ID: 23972827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Impact of occupational noise on pure-tone threshold and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after one workday.
    Müller J; Janssen T
    Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 246(1-2):9-22. PubMed ID: 18848612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of contralateral noise on distortion product latency in humans: is the medial olivocochlear efferent system involved?
    Giraud AL; Wable J; Chays A; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2219-27. PubMed ID: 9348679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of noise bandwidth on the contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Velenovsky DS; Glattke TJ
    Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 164(1-2):39-48. PubMed ID: 11950523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Impact of three hours of discotheque music on pure-tone thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Müller J; Dietrich S; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1853-69. PubMed ID: 20968358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of broadband and narrowband contralateral noise on psychophysical tuning curves and otoacoustic emissions.
    Wicher A; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):2931-41. PubMed ID: 24815273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Recognition of speech in noise and relations with suppression of otoacoustic emissions and the acoustic reflex].
    Lautenschlager L; Tochetto T; Costa MJ
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21340199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
    Ibargüen AM; Santaolalla Montoya F; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on otoacoustic emissions following vestibular neurectomy.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 8210961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [The application of otoacoustic emissions measurement in the assessment of the function of cochlear efferent fibers: the study of normal hearing subjects].
    Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1999; 53(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10337165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: a potential diagnostic tool to evaluate the vestibular nerve.
    Chang MY; Song JJ; Kim JS; Koo JW
    Med Hypotheses; 2013 Nov; 81(5):830-3. PubMed ID: 24074898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Measurement of the distribution of medial olivocochlear acoustic reflex strengths across normal-hearing individuals via otoacoustic emissions.
    Backus BC; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 8(4):484-96. PubMed ID: 17932717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reduced auditory efferent activity in childhood selective mutism.
    Bar-Haim Y; Henkin Y; Ari-Even-Roth D; Tetin-Schneider S; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Biol Psychiatry; 2004 Jun; 55(11):1061-8. PubMed ID: 15158424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A study of the acoustic reflex using fast-rate otoacoustic emissions.
    Norman M; Thornton AR; Slaven A
    Br J Audiol; 1998 Jun; 32(3):139-52. PubMed ID: 9710333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. No Influence of Musicianship on the Effect of Contralateral Stimulation on Frequency Selectivity.
    Tarnowska E; Wicher A; Moore BCJ
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520939776. PubMed ID: 32840175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.