160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16093635)
1. Deconvolution analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced data based on singular value decomposition optimized by generalized cross validation.
Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Miyazaki S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2004; 3(4):165-75. PubMed ID: 16093635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model applied to quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Shinohara M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2003 Jul; 2(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 16210825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Error analysis of tumor blood flow measurement using dynamic contrast-enhanced data and model-independent deconvolution analysis.
Murase K; Miyazaki S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(10):2791-805. PubMed ID: 17473352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of deconvolution analysis based on singular value decomposition for quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Murase K; Shinohara M; Yamazaki Y
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Dec; 46(12):3147-59. PubMed ID: 11768497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Choice of the regularization parameter for perfusion quantification with MRI.
Sourbron S; Luypaert R; Van Schuerbeek P; Dujardin M; Stadnik T
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(14):3307-24. PubMed ID: 15357199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cerebral blood flow estimation from perfusion-weighted MRI using FT-based MMSE filtering method.
Sakoglu U; Sood R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Apr; 26(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 18158225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deconvolution of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data by linear inversion: choice of the regularization parameter.
Sourbron S; Luypaert R; Van Schuerbeek P; Dujardin M; Stadnik T; Osteaux M
Magn Reson Med; 2004 Jul; 52(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 15236389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DSC perfusion MRI-Quantification and reduction of systematic errors arising in areas of reduced cerebral blood flow.
Carpenter TK; Armitage PA; Bastin ME; Wardlaw JM
Magn Reson Med; 2006 Jun; 55(6):1342-9. PubMed ID: 16683256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reference-based maximum upslope: a CBF quantification method without using arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Kimura T; Kusahara H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2009; 8(3):107-20. PubMed ID: 19783874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation.
Brunecker P; Villringer A; Schultze J; Nolte CH; Jungehülsing GJ; Endres M; Steinbrink J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 25(9):1300-11. PubMed ID: 17462846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition.
Calamante F; Gadian DG; Connelly A
Magn Reson Med; 2000 Sep; 44(3):466-73. PubMed ID: 10975900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Model-free arterial spin labeling quantification approach for perfusion MRI.
Petersen ET; Lim T; Golay X
Magn Reson Med; 2006 Feb; 55(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 16416430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advantages of frequency-domain modeling in dynamic-susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance cerebral blood flow quantification.
Chen JJ; Smith MR; Frayne R
Magn Reson Med; 2005 Mar; 53(3):700-7. PubMed ID: 15723395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aspects on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a simulation study.
Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 22(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 15234447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of regional tracer delay on CBF in healthy subjects measured with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with 15O-PET.
Ibaraki M; Shimosegawa E; Toyoshima H; Ishigame K; Ito H; Takahashi K; Miura S; Kanno I
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2005; 4(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16127251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of bolus-tracking MRI: Improved characterization of the tissue residue function using Tikhonov regularization.
Calamante F; Gadian DG; Connelly A
Magn Reson Med; 2003 Dec; 50(6):1237-47. PubMed ID: 14648572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tracer delay correction of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI.
Ibaraki M; Shimosegawa E; Toyoshima H; Takahashi K; Miura S; Kanno I
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2005 Mar; 25(3):378-90. PubMed ID: 15674238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A control point interpolation method for the non-parametric quantification of cerebral haemodynamics from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Mehndiratta A; MacIntosh BJ; Crane DE; Payne SJ; Chappell MA
Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():560-70. PubMed ID: 22975158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stable spline deconvolution for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Peruzzo D; Castellaro M; Pillonetto G; Bertoldo A
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Nov; 78(5):1801-1811. PubMed ID: 28070897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI with a prebolus contrast agent administration design for improved absolute quantification of perfusion.
Knutsson L; Lindgren E; Ahlgren A; van Osch MJ; Bloch KM; Surova Y; Ståhlberg F; van Westen D; Wirestam R
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Oct; 72(4):996-1006. PubMed ID: 24285621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
