These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16094540)

  • 1. Isolated acetabular revision after total hip arthroplasty: results at 5-9 years of follow-up.
    Chen XD; Waddell JP; Morton J; Schemitsch EH
    Int Orthop; 2005 Oct; 29(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 16094540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results of isolated acetabular revisions: the fate of the unrevised femoral component.
    Poon ED; Lachiewicz PF
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Jan; 13(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 9493537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fate of stable femoral components retained during isolated acetabular revision: a six-to-twelve-year follow-up study.
    Moskal JT; Shen FH; Brown TE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Feb; 84(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 11861731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiological evaluation of allograft reconstruction in acetabulum with Ganz reinforcement ring in revision total hip replacement.
    Uchiyama K; Takahira N; Fukushima K; Yamamoto T; Moriya M; Itoman M
    J Orthop Sci; 2010 Nov; 15(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 21116894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.
    de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty using an impacted morselized allograft and a cementless cup: minimum 10-year follow-up.
    Lee JM; Nam HT
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Oct; 26(7):1057-60. PubMed ID: 21592720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should the well-fixed, uncemented femoral components be revised during isolated acetabular revision?
    Fukui K; Kaneuji A; Sugimori T; Ichiseki T; Kitamura K; Matsumoto T
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Apr; 131(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 20665041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
    Krbec M; Adler J; Messner P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12807040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Selection of the type in revision total hip replacement for failed hip arthroplasty].
    Zhang XB; Song JH; Wang KZ
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 18(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 15065415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Acetabular reconstruction using bone allograft in the revision of total hip prosthesis].
    Morand F; Clarac JP; Gayet LE; Pries P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1998 Apr; 84(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 9775059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Acetabulum reinforcement ring with allograft bone for reconstructing acetabular defects in hip revision].
    Liu W; Yang J; Pei F; Shen B; Zhou Z; Kang P
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 26(8):902-4. PubMed ID: 23012918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural and Morselized Allografting Combined with a Cementless Cup for Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 4- to 14-Year Follow-Up.
    Chen HT; Wu CT; Huang TW; Shih HN; Wang JW; Lee MS
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():2364269. PubMed ID: 29511673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Porous-ingrowth revision acetabular implants secured with peripheral screws. A minimum twelve-year follow-up.
    Weeden SH; Paprosky WG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jun; 88(6):1266-71. PubMed ID: 16757760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Exeter Contemporary flanged cemented acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Maggs JL; Smeatham A; Whitehouse SL; Charity J; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 26920954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reconstruction of acetabular bone deficiency in total hip arthroplasty].
    Yang B; Lin J; Weng XS; Jin J; Zhao Q; Qiu GX
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 47(12):920-3. PubMed ID: 19781247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
    Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up.
    Garbuz D; Morsi E; Gross AE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 May; 78(5):693-7. PubMed ID: 8642025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimum ten-year results of primary bipolar hip arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the hip.
    Pellegrini VD; Heiges BA; Bixler B; Lehman EB; Davis CM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1817-25. PubMed ID: 16882907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Isolated revision acetabuloplasty using a porous-coated cementless acetabular component without removal of a well-fixed femoral component. A 3- to 9-year follow-up study.
    Moskal JT; Danisa OA; Shaffrey CI
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Oct; 12(7):719-27. PubMed ID: 9355000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of morselized allografts without impaction and cemented cage support in acetabular revision surgery: a 4- to 9-year follow-up.
    Ding H; Mao Y; Yu B; Zhu Z; Li H; Yu B; Huang J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 May; 10():77. PubMed ID: 25998544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.