229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16094588)
1. Strength analysis of titanium and resorbable internal fixation in a mandibulotomy model.
Ricalde P; Engroff SL; Von Fraunhofer JA; Posnick JC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 63(8):1180-3. PubMed ID: 16094588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strength analysis of Le Fort I osteotomy fixation: titanium versus resorbable plates.
Araujo MM; Waite PD; Lemons JE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Sep; 59(9):1034-9; discussion 1039-40. PubMed ID: 11526573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of fixation stability of resorbable versus titanium plate and screws in mandibular angle fractures.
Bayram B; Araz K; Uckan S; Balcik C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1644-8. PubMed ID: 19615576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerized analysis of resorbable polymer plates and screws for the rigid fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
Cox T; Kohn MW; Impelluso T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 61(4):481-7; discussion 487-8. PubMed ID: 12684967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immediate mechanical stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixed with resorbable compared with titanium bicortical screws in mandibles of sheep.
Cilasun U; Uckan S; Dolanmaz D; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):534-7. PubMed ID: 16423434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation.
Costa F; Robiony M; Zorzan E; Zerman N; Politi M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):642-51. PubMed ID: 16546644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of in vitro resistance of titanium and resorbable (poly-L-DL-lactic acid) fixation systems on the mandibular angle fracture.
Bregagnolo LA; Bertelli PF; Ribeiro MC; Sverzut CE; Trivellato AE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 21067895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of titanium, biodegradable plate and screw, and cyanoacrylate glue fixation systems in craniofacial surgery.
Gosain AK; Song L; Corrao MA; Pintar FA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Mar; 101(3):582-91. PubMed ID: 9500375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of titanium and resorbable copolymer fixation after Le Fort I maxillary impaction.
Dhol WS; Reyneke JP; Tompson B; Sándor GK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 18617105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rigid internal fixation with titanium versus bioresorbable miniplates in the repair of mandibular fractures in rabbits.
Hochuli-Vieira E; Cabrini Gabrielli MA; Pereira-Filho VA; Gabrielli MF; Padilha JG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15695046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strength analysis of 6 resorbable implant systems: does heating affect the stress-strain curve?
Ricalde P; Caccamese J; Norby C; Posnick JC; Hartman MJ; von Fraunhofer JA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2493-7. PubMed ID: 19022129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A resorbable rivet system for pediatric craniofacial surgery: biomechanical testing and clinical experience.
Eppley BL; Pietrzak WS
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 16432401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An experimental study of heat adaptation of bioabsorbable craniofacial meshes and plates.
Pietrzak WS; Eppley BL
J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):540-5. PubMed ID: 17538315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resorbable bone fixation: its potential role in cranio-maxillofacial trauma.
Eppley BL; Prevel CD; Sadove AM; Sarver D
J Craniomaxillofac Trauma; 1996; 2(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 11951475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pediatric zygomatico-orbital complex fractures: the use of resorbable plating systems. A case report.
Triana RJ; Shockley WW
J Craniomaxillofac Trauma; 1998; 4(4):32-6. PubMed ID: 11951279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
