These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16095042)

  • 1. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.
    Vadillo MA; Matute H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 17366310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceiving a strong causal relation in a weak contingency: further investigation of the evidential evaluation model of causal judgement.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 11873858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relative effect of cue interaction.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Aug; 56(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 12881163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extinction in human learning and memory.
    Scully AL; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1472-8. PubMed ID: 18609395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causal judgement from contingency information: judging interactions between two causal candidates.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):819-38. PubMed ID: 12188515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning in a changing environment.
    Speekenbrink M; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):266-98. PubMed ID: 20438252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Higher-order retrospective revaluation in human causal learning.
    De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Apr; 55(2):137-51. PubMed ID: 12075980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information integration in multiple cue judgment: a division of labor hypothesis.
    Juslin P; Karlsson L; Olsson H
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):259-98. PubMed ID: 17376423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The experimental task influences cue competition in human causal learning.
    Melchers KG; Ungör M; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 16248733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learned associability and associative change in human causal learning.
    Le Pelley ME; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Feb; 56(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 12623538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cue-interaction effects in contingency judgments using the streamed-trial procedure.
    Hannah SD; Crump MJ; Allan LG; Siegel S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Jun; 63(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 19485601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: II. Effects of information about one cause on judgements of the other cause.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):999-1021. PubMed ID: 16194945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.