These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16095848)
1. Evaluating the influence of setup uncertainties on treatment planning for focal liver tumors. Balter JM; Brock KK; Lam KL; Tatro D; Dawson LA; McShan DL; Ten Haken RK Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):610-4. PubMed ID: 16095848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans. Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT. Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of geometric uncertainties on evaluation of treatment techniques for prostate cancer. Craig T; Wong E; Bauman G; Battista J; Van Dyk J Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):426-36. PubMed ID: 15890584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic online adaptive radiation therapy techniques for targets with significant shape change: a feasibility study. Court LE; Tishler RB; Petit J; Cormack R; Chin L Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2493-501. PubMed ID: 16675865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures. Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An application of Bayesian statistical methods to adaptive radiotherapy. Lam KL; Ten Haken RK; Litzenberg D; Balter JM; Pollock SM Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3849-58. PubMed ID: 16077231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning. Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties. Cranmer-Sargison G; Zavgorodni S Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16177533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A phase I/II trial to evaluate three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy confined to the region of the lumpectomy cavity for Stage I/II breast carcinoma: initial report of feasibility and reproducibility of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Study 0319. Vicini F; Winter K; Straube W; Wong J; Pass H; Rabinovitch R; Chafe S; Arthur D; Petersen I; McCormick B Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Dec; 63(5):1531-7. PubMed ID: 16198508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intensity modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: the sensitivity of plan objectives and constraints to set-up uncertainty. Ploquin N; Song W; Lau H; Dunscombe P Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3515-33. PubMed ID: 16030380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simulation of dose to surrounding normal structures in tangential breast radiotherapy due to setup error. Prabhakar R; Rath GK; Julka PK; Ganesh T; Haresh KP; Joshi RC; Senthamizhchelvan S; Thulkar S; Pant GS Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 18262128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A phase II trial for the optimisation of treatment position in the radiation therapy of prostate cancer. O'Neill L; Armstrong J; Buckney S; Assiri M; Cannon M; Holmberg O Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18453021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A treatment planning investigation into the dosimetric effects of systematic prostate patient rotational set-up errors. Cranmer-Sargison G Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 18674684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alterations in normal liver doses due to organ motion. Rosu M; Dawson LA; Balter JM; McShan DL; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Dec; 57(5):1472-9. PubMed ID: 14630287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modelling the variation in rectal dose due to inter-fraction rectal wall deformation in external beam prostate treatments. Booth J; Zavgorodni S Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5055-74. PubMed ID: 16237241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of dose compensation in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Wu Q; Liang J; Yan D Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1405-19. PubMed ID: 16510952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image-guided cervix high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning: does custom computed tomography planning for each insertion provide better conformal avoidance of organs at risk? Davidson MT; Yuen J; D'Souza DP; Batchelar DL Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 18299111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the 3D-conformal, helical tomotherapy and multileaf collimators-based intensity modulated radiotherapy modalities using radiobiological measures. Mavroidis P; Costa Ferreira B; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N J BUON; 2008; 13(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 18404791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of daily setup measurements and corrections on the estimated delivered dose during IMRT treatment of prostate cancer patients. van Haaren PM; Bel A; Hofman P; van Vulpen M; Kotte AN; van der Heide UA Radiother Oncol; 2009 Mar; 90(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 19195732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]