These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16096227)

  • 21. Auditory localization for spatial orientation.
    Endsley MR; Rosiles SA
    J Vestib Res; 1995; 5(6):473-85. PubMed ID: 8589857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory spatial representations of the world are compressed in blind humans.
    Kolarik AJ; Pardhan S; Cirstea S; Moore BC
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 235(2):597-606. PubMed ID: 27837259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reorganisation of the right occipito-parietal stream for auditory spatial processing in early blind humans. A transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Collignon O; Davare M; Olivier E; De Volder AG
    Brain Topogr; 2009 May; 21(3-4):232-40. PubMed ID: 19199020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cross-modal localization in hemianopia: new insights on multisensory integration.
    Leo F; Bolognini N; Passamonti C; Stein BE; Làdavas E
    Brain; 2008 Mar; 131(Pt 3):855-65. PubMed ID: 18263626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improved selective and divided spatial attention in early blind subjects.
    Collignon O; Renier L; Bruyer R; Tranduy D; Veraart C
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1075(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 16460716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The head-centered meridian effect: auditory attention orienting in conditions of impaired visuo-spatial information.
    Olivetti Belardinelli M; Santangelo V
    Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Jul; 27(13):761-8. PubMed ID: 16096228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Early visual deprivation prompts the use of body-centered frames of reference for auditory localization.
    Vercillo T; Tonelli A; Gori M
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():263-269. PubMed ID: 29096327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hemispheric competence for auditory spatial representation.
    Spierer L; Bellmann-Thiran A; Maeder P; Murray MM; Clarke S
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1953-66. PubMed ID: 19477962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Opposing effects of head position on sound localization in blind and sighted human subjects.
    Lewald J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2002 Apr; 15(7):1219-24. PubMed ID: 11982632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. EEG coherence in early-blind humans during sound localization.
    Leclerc C; Segalowitz SJ; Desjardins J; Lassonde M; Lepore F
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Mar; 376(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 15721213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Audiotactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind individuals.
    Occelli V; Spence C; Zampini M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2845-50. PubMed ID: 18603271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory spatial localization: Developmental delay in children with visual impairments.
    Cappagli G; Gori M
    Res Dev Disabil; 2016; 53-54():391-8. PubMed ID: 27002960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory cued spatial learning in mice.
    Watanabe S; Yoshida M
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Dec; 92(5):906-10. PubMed ID: 17669446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neuromagnetic recordings reveal the temporal dynamics of auditory spatial processing in the human cortex.
    Tiitinen H; Salminen NH; Palomäki KJ; Mäkinen VT; Alku P; May PJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Mar; 396(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16343772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatial processing in human auditory cortex: the effects of 3D, ITD, and ILD stimulation techniques.
    Palomäki KJ; Tiitinen H; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):364-79. PubMed ID: 16099350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between postural stability and spatial hearing.
    Zhong X; Yost WA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):782-8. PubMed ID: 24224986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Blind subjects process auditory spectral cues more efficiently than sighted individuals.
    Doucet ME; Guillemot JP; Lassonde M; Gagné JP; Leclerc C; Lepore F
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 15309355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The parietal distance effect appears in both the congenitally blind and matched sighted controls in an acoustic number comparison task.
    Szucs D; Csépe V
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug 12-19; 384(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 15893429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mismatch negativity on the cone of confusion.
    Röttger S; Schröger E; Grube M; Grimm S; Rübsamen R
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Mar; 414(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 17223265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.