These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16097224)

  • 21. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation.
    Byloff FK; Darendeliler MA
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 9267573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maxillary molar distalization with noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in Class II malocclusion. A systematic review.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1133-40. PubMed ID: 18947282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intraoral maxillary molar distalization.
    Karlsson I; Bondemark L
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):923-9. PubMed ID: 17090171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanics of the Keles Slider appliance for maxillary molar distalization--in-vitro analysis of force systems.
    Kinzinger G; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Sep; 69(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 19238888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of two maxillary molar distalizing appliances with the distal jet.
    Ferguson DJ; Carano A; Bowman SJ; Davis EC; Gutierrez Vega ME; Lee SH
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16379210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effectiveness of a single osteointegrated implant combined with pendulum springs for molar distalization.
    Oncağ G; Akyalçin S; Arikan F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 17276871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nickel-titanium coil springs and repelling magnets: a comparison of two different intra-oral molar distalization techniques.
    Erverdi N; Koyutürk O; Küçükkeles N
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 9088603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Posttreatment evaluation of the distal jet appliance.
    Ngantung V; Nanda RS; Bowman SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 11500660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of a segmented removable appliance in molar distalization.
    Akin E; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 16436365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development of a new device for maxillary molar distalization with high pseudoelastic forces to overcome slider friction: the Longslider--a modification of the Beneslider.
    Longerich UJ; Thurau M; Kolk A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Jul; 118(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 23183028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 2: The effects of maxillary molar root uprighting bends.
    Byloff FK; Darendeliler MA; Clar E; Darendeliler A
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 9267574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanics of a Distal Jet appliance. Theoretical considerations and in vitro analysis of force systems.
    Kinzinger GS; Diedrich PR
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jul; 78(4):676-81. PubMed ID: 18302467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Clinical application of modified distal-jet appliance in distalization of maxillary molar].
    Zhang MM; Sun TT; Liu L
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 25(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 17663332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [A comparative study of clinical application of two types appliances for maxillary molar distalization].
    Wang Z; Huang C; Zhou H; Liu Z
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 19(5):309-11. PubMed ID: 12539488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Class II treatment by palatal miniscrew-system appliance:
    Lombardo L; Occhiuto G; Paoletto E; Maino BG; Siciliani G
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):305-313. PubMed ID: 30860863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage.
    Polat-Ozsoy O; Kircelli BH; Arman-Ozçirpici A; Pektaş ZO; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e9-339.e17. PubMed ID: 18331928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Anchorage provided during intra-arch distal molar movement: a comparison between the Nance appliance and a fixed frontal bite plane.
    Bondemark L; Thornéus J
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):437-43. PubMed ID: 15898386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Molar distalization with bimetric molar distalization arches.
    Küçükkeleş N; Doğanay A
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1994 Sep; 2(1):399-403. PubMed ID: 9582621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the effects of the hybrid Pendulum in comparison with the conventional Pendulum appliance.
    Bozkaya E; Tortop T; Yüksel S; Kaygısız E
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 31642688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An implant to eliminate anchorage loss during molar distalization: a case report involving the Graz implant-supported pendulum.
    Byloff FK; Kärcher H; Clar E; Stoff F
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 11307423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.