These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16097339)

  • 1. Efficiently measuring recognition performance with sparse data.
    Schooler LJ; Shiffrin RM
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 Feb; 37(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16097339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures.
    Rotello CM; Masson ME; Verde MF
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):389-401. PubMed ID: 18372758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring function estimators as an alternative to regression in psychology.
    Walker I; Milne S
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 Feb; 37(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 16097341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of different strategies for computing confidence intervals of the linkage disequilibrium measure D'.
    Kim SK; Zhang K; Sun F
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2004; ():128-39. PubMed ID: 14992498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Random assignment of available cases: bootstrap standard errors and confidence intervals.
    Lunneborg CE
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 11778680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analyzing recognition performance with sparse data.
    Sheu CF; Lee YS; Shih PY
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Aug; 40(3):722-7. PubMed ID: 18697667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standard errors and confidence intervals for correlations corrected for indirect range restriction: A simulation study comparing analytic and bootstrap methods.
    Kennet-Cohen T; Kleper D; Turvall E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 28631350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measures of metacognition on signal-detection theoretic models.
    Barrett AB; Dienes Z; Seth AK
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Dec; 18(4):535-52. PubMed ID: 24079931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One-sided nonparametric tests for ordinal data.
    Neuhäuser M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Oct; 101(2):510-4. PubMed ID: 16383087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction in clinical CT systems. Part III. Task-based kV/mAs optimization for radiation dose reduction.
    Li K; Gomez-Cardona D; Hsieh J; Lubner MG; Pickhardt PJ; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5209-21. PubMed ID: 26328971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variance of d' for the same-different method.
    Bi J
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2002 Feb; 34(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 12060988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes.
    Masson ME; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):509-27. PubMed ID: 19271863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of different statistical methods analyzing hypoglycemia data using bootstrap simulations.
    Jiang H; Ni X; Huster W; Heilmann C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 24905704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method.
    Dwivedi AK; Mallawaarachchi I; Alvarado LA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2187-2205. PubMed ID: 28276584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the significance of scale values from multidimensional scaling profile analysis using a resampling method.
    Ding CS
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 Feb; 37(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 16097342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.