These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16097339)

  • 21. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
    Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
    J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multiple-group analysis approach to testing group difference in indirect effects.
    Ryu E
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):484-93. PubMed ID: 24907002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recovering the variance of d' from hit and false alarm statistics.
    Botella J; Suero M
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Feb; 52(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 30684227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Type I error inflation in the traditional by-participant analysis to metamemory accuracy: a generalized mixed-effects model perspective.
    Murayama K; Sakaki M; Yan VX; Smith GM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1287-306. PubMed ID: 24911135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measuring discriminability when there are multiple sources of bias.
    Brown GS; White KG
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Feb; 41(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 19182126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Signal Detection Measures Cannot Distinguish Perceptual Biases from Response Biases.
    Witt JK; Taylor JE; Sugovic M; Wixted JT
    Perception; 2015 Mar; 44(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 26562253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detecting a lack of association: an equivalence testing approach.
    Goertzen JR; Cribbie RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):527-37. PubMed ID: 20030968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.
    Collins LM; Schafer JL; Kam CM
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):330-51. PubMed ID: 11778676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy when inferential statistics are used as measurement tools.
    Bradley MT; Brand A
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():241. PubMed ID: 27112752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the uses and applications of the most commonly used measures of linkage disequilibrium from the comparative analysis of their statistical properties.
    Zapata C
    Hum Hered; 2011; 71(3):186-95. PubMed ID: 21778738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How to Compare the Length of Stay of Two Samples of Inpatients? A Simulation Study to Compare Type I and Type II Errors of 12 Statistical Tests.
    Chazard E; Ficheur G; Beuscart JB; Preda C
    Value Health; 2017; 20(7):992-998. PubMed ID: 28712630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Simplified Estimation and Testing in Unbalanced Repeated Measures Designs.
    Spiess M; Jordan P; Wendt M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):212-235. PubMed ID: 29736784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Hartmann WM
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 17563170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the efficiency of bootstrap method into the analysis contingency table.
    Amiri S; von Rosen D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Nov; 104(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 21458876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter?
    Hayes AF; Scharkow M
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1918-27. PubMed ID: 23955356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigating the impact of observation errors on the statistical performance of network-based diffusion analysis.
    Franz M; Nunn CL
    Learn Behav; 2010 Aug; 38(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 20628162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A psychometric analysis of signal detection measures from ratings versus repeated and nonrepeated forced choices.
    Macho S; Ledermann T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1923-1946. PubMed ID: 35737545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing dependent correlations.
    Wilcox RR; Tian T
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 18318411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A permutation test for the race model inequality.
    Gondan M
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20160282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.