These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16097342)

  • 1. Determining the significance of scale values from multidimensional scaling profile analysis using a resampling method.
    Ding CS
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 Feb; 37(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 16097342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the performance of different procedures for constructing confidence intervals for coefficient alpha: a simulation study.
    Cui Y; Li J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):467-98. PubMed ID: 22295951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.
    Collins LM; Schafer JL; Kam CM
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):330-51. PubMed ID: 11778676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resampling dependent concordance correlation coefficients.
    Williamson JM; Crawford SB; Lin HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):685-96. PubMed ID: 17613648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the far reaching effects of using biased estimates of score reliability: an examination of the problem in 20 data analyses.
    Becker G
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 11783552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stability of questionnaire items in sport and exercise psychology: bootstrap limits of agreement.
    Wilson K; Batterham A
    J Sports Sci; 1999 Sep; 17(9):725-34. PubMed ID: 10521003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bootstrapping with models for count data.
    Manly BF
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Nov; 21(6):1164-76. PubMed ID: 22023684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Random assignment of available cases: bootstrap standard errors and confidence intervals.
    Lunneborg CE
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 11778680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Four applications of permutation methods to testing a single-mediator model.
    Taylor AB; MacKinnon DP
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):806-44. PubMed ID: 22311738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Hartmann WM
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 17563170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficiency of different search strategies in estimating parsimony jackknife, bootstrap, and Bremer support.
    Müller KF
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Oct; 5():58. PubMed ID: 16255783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A proposed framework for conducting data-based test analysis.
    Slaney KL; Maraun MD
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Dec; 13(4):376-90. PubMed ID: 19072000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imince: an unrestricted factor-analysis-based program for assessing measurement invariance.
    Lorenzo-Seva U; Ferrando PJ
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 May; 35(2):318-21. PubMed ID: 12834090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-mode analysis of multimode covariance matrices.
    Kroonenberg PM; Oort FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):305-35. PubMed ID: 14633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fitting Emax models to clinical trial dose-response data when the high dose asymptote is ill defined.
    Brain P; Kirby S; Larionov R
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 25228394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the asymptotic standard error of a class of robust estimators of ability in dichotomous item response models.
    Magis D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 24016181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data.
    Sinharay S; Stern HS; Russell D
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):317-29. PubMed ID: 11778675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic methodology: a bootstrap analysis.
    Dofrman DD; Berbaum KS; Lenth RV
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Jul; 2(7):626-33. PubMed ID: 9419615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.