These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16097980)

  • 21. Techniques for cesarean section.
    Hofmeyr JG; Novikova N; Mathai M; Shah A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):431-44. PubMed ID: 19879392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Study on modification of the Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section.
    Li M; Zou L; Zhu J
    J Tongji Med Univ; 2001; 21(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 11523256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incidence of post-operative adhesions following Misgav Ladach caesarean section--a comparative study.
    Fatusić Z; Hudić I
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Feb; 22(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 19253164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Double-layer closure of uterine incision with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure: are they obligatory steps of routine cesarean sections?
    Ohel G; Younis JS; Lang N; Levit A
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 8972417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section].
    Habek D; Kulas T; Karsa M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2007 Apr; 61(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 17585470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospective, randomized, comparative study of Misgav Ladach versus traditional cesarean section at Nazareth Hospital, Kenya.
    Ansaloni L; Brundisini R; Morino G; Kiura A
    World J Surg; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1164-72. PubMed ID: 11571954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What about the Misgav-Ladach surgical technique in patients with previous cesarean sections?
    Bolze PA; Massoud M; Gaucherand P; Doret M
    Am J Perinatol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 22875660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative analysis of long-term outcomes of Misgav Ladach technique cesarean section and traditional cesarean section.
    Ghahiry A; Rezaei F; Karimi Khouzani R; Ashrafinia M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1235-9. PubMed ID: 22845718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Towards simplified cesarean section?].
    Gaucherand P; Bessai K; Sergeant P; Rudigoz RC
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Jun; 30(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 11431614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of methergine for the prevention of postoperative endometritis in non-elective cesarean section patients.
    Dweck MF; Lynch CM; Spellacy WN
    Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 2000; 8(3-4):151-4. PubMed ID: 10968597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparative study of early postoperative feeding versus conventional feeding for patients undergoing cesarean section; a randomized controlled trial.
    Chantarasorn V; Tannirandorn Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89 Suppl 4():S11-6. PubMed ID: 17725138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Risk factors in the development of cesarean section infection.
    Repke JT; Spence MR; Calhoun S
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Feb; 158(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 6364424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery.
    Ramsey PS; White AM; Guinn DA; Lu GC; Ramin SM; Davies JK; Neely CL; Newby C; Fonseca L; Case AS; Kaslow RA; Kirby RS; Rouse DJ; Hauth JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):967-73. PubMed ID: 15863532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modified Stark's (Misgav Ladach) caesarean section: 15 - year experience of the own techniques of caesarean section.
    Habek D; Cerovac A; Luetić A; Marton I; Prka M; Kulaš T; Ujević B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():90-93. PubMed ID: 32087422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A randomised controlled trial of uterine exteriorisation and non-exteriorisation at caesarean section.
    Orji EO; Olaleye AO; Loto OM; Ogunniyi SO
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Dec; 48(6):570-4. PubMed ID: 19133045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-Cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial.
    Nafisi S
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2007 Apr; 16(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 17276669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Innovations of the Stark method for cesarean section. Comparison of techniques].
    Grignaffini A; Bazzani F; Rinaldi M; Azzoni D; Vadora E
    Minerva Ginecol; 1999 Dec; 51(12):475-82. PubMed ID: 10767996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of placental removal method and site of uterine repair on postcesarean endometritis and operative blood loss.
    Baksu A; Kalan A; Ozkan A; Baksu B; Tekelioğlu M; Goker N
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Mar; 84(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 15715535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of ceftriaxone versus triple drug regimen in the prevention of cesarean section infectious morbidities.
    Alekwe LO; Kuti O; Orji EO; Ogunniyi SO
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Sep; 21(9):638-42. PubMed ID: 18828055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pelosi-type vs. traditional cesarean delivery. A prospective comparison.
    Wood RM; Simon H; Oz AU
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Sep; 44(9):788-95. PubMed ID: 10509303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.