141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16098814)
1. Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Salm LP; Schuijf JD; de Roos A; Lamb HJ; Vliegen HW; Jukema JW; Joemai R; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ
Eur J Echocardiogr; 2006 Aug; 7(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 16098814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating global and regional left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction by 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.
Sarwar A; Shapiro MD; Nasir K; Nieman K; Nomura CH; Brady TJ; Cury RC
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(3):170-7. PubMed ID: 19527893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function using 64-slice multislice computed tomography and 2D echocardiography: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
Annuar BR; Liew CK; Chin SP; Ong TK; Seyfarth MT; Chan WL; Fong YY; Ang CK; Lin N; Liew HB; Sim KH
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 17466480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging].
Koch K; Oellig F; Kunz P; Bender P; Oberholzer K; Mildenberger P; Hake U; Kreitner KF; Thelen M
Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1786-93. PubMed ID: 15573290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Left ventricular remodelling and systolic function measurement with 64 multi-slice computed tomography versus second harmonic echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease: a double blind study.
Palazzuoli A; Cademartiri F; Geleijnse ML; Meijboom B; Pugliese F; Soliman O; Calabrò A; Nuti R; de Feyter P
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 19013044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of left ventricular volumes using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT): phantom and human studies.
Hosoi S; Mochizuki T; Miyagawa M; Shen Y; Murase K; Ikezoe J
Radiat Med; 2003; 21(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 12816352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of left ventricular parameters obtained by automated software for 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Akram K; Anderson HD; Voros S
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Nov; 32(6):1154-60. PubMed ID: 19771473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of cardiac dimensions, mass and function in heart transplant recipients using 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography.
Ferencik M; Gregory SA; Butler J; Achenbach S; Yeh RW; Hoffmann U; Inglessis I; Cury RC; Nieman K; McNulty IA; Healy JA; Brady TJ; Semigran MJ; Jang IK
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2007 May; 26(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 17449417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging.
Yamamuro M; Tadamura E; Kubo S; Toyoda H; Nishina T; Ohba M; Hosokawa R; Kimura T; Tamaki N; Komeda M; Kita T; Konishi J
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 15670995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of global left ventricular function comparing multidetector computed tomography with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Sharma A; Einstein AJ; Vallakati A; Arbab-Zadeh A; Mukherjee D; Lichstein E
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 113(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 24355312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of global and regional cardiac function using 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison study with echocardiography, gated-SPECT and cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Wu YW; Tadamura E; Yamamuro M; Kanao S; Okayama S; Ozasa N; Toma M; Kimura T; Komeda M; Togashi K
Int J Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 128(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 17692410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New generation 3-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular volumetric and functional measurements: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
Nikitin NP; Constantin C; Loh PH; Ghosh J; Lukaschuk EI; Bennett A; Hurren S; Alamgir F; Clark AL; Cleland JG
Eur J Echocardiogr; 2006 Oct; 7(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 16916621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of left ventricular function with a 16-slice multidetector tomograph (MDCT-16): correlation with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging].
de la Peña-Almaguer E; Azpiri López JR; González-Camid Fde J; Ponce de León E; Flores-Ramírez R; Zamarripa R; Loera J; Rodríguez D; González Quijano R; Azpiri-Magallanes M; Jaramillo Estrada S; Assad Morell JL
Arch Cardiol Mex; 2005; 75(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 15909741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional imaging in the assessment of myocardial infarction: MR imaging vs. MDCT vs. SPECT.
Mahnken AH; Bruners P; Stanzel S; Koos R; Mühlenbruch G; Günther RW; Reinartz P
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):480-5. PubMed ID: 18650043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance.
Raman SV; Shah M; McCarthy B; Garcia A; Ferketich AK
Am Heart J; 2006 Mar; 151(3):736-44. PubMed ID: 16504643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience.
Juergens KU; Grude M; Maintz D; Fallenberg EM; Wichter T; Heindel W; Fischbach R
Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):403-10. PubMed ID: 14668428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using 4-channel MDCT.
Boehm T; Alkadhi H; Roffi M; Willmann JK; Desbiolles LM; Marincek B; Wildermuth S
Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 15088177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multidetector computed tomography in reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Assessment of infarct size and no-reflow in comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Jacquier A; Boussel L; Amabile N; Bartoli JM; Douek P; Moulin G; Paganelli F; Saeed M; Revel D; Croisille P
Invest Radiol; 2008 Nov; 43(11):773-81. PubMed ID: 18923256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of contrast agent-enhanced versus non-contrast agent-enhanced real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for analysis of left ventricular systolic function.
Krenning BJ; Kirschbaum SW; Soliman OI; Nemes A; van Geuns RJ; Vletter WB; Veltman CE; Ten Cate FJ; Roelandt JR; Geleijnse ML
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Nov; 100(9):1485-9. PubMed ID: 17950813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of healed myocardial infarction with multidetector-row computed tomography and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance delayed hyperenhancement.
Sanz J; Weeks D; Nikolaou K; Sirol M; Rius T; Rajagopalan S; Dellegrottaglie S; Strobeck J; Fuster V; Poon M
Am J Cardiol; 2006 Jul; 98(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 16828583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
