These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16098997)

  • 1. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
    Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
    Shore DI; Barnes ME; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16213655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Walton M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):47-70. PubMed ID: 15627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multisensory stimulation with or without saccades: fMRI evidence for crossmodal effects on sensory-specific cortices that reflect multisensory location-congruence rather than task-relevance.
    Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):414-25. PubMed ID: 15907299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visuotactile temporal order judgments in ageing.
    Poliakoff E; Shore DI; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 16356634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Pavani F; Maravita A; Holmes N
    J Physiol Paris; 2004; 98(1-3):171-89. PubMed ID: 15477031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Aging and cognitive slowing: example of attentional processes--evaluation procedures and related questions].
    Eusop E; Sebban C; Piette F
    Encephale; 2001; 27(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11294037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seeing the body modulates audiotactile integration.
    Aspell JE; Lavanchy T; Lenggenhager B; Blanke O
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1868-73. PubMed ID: 20584191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When far is near: ERP correlates of crossmodal spatial interactions between tactile and mirror-reflected visual stimuli.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Aug; 500(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21683122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crossmodal change blindness between vision and touch.
    Auvray M; Gallace A; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Oct; 126(2):79-97. PubMed ID: 17187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
    Mayer AR; Kosson DS
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of task-relevance on primary somatosensory cortex during continuous sensory-guided movement in the presence of bimodal competition.
    Meehan SK; Staines WR
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1138():148-58. PubMed ID: 17275792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of attention on the illusory capture of motion in bimodal stimuli.
    Oruc I; Sinnett S; Bischof WF; Soto-Faraco S; Lock K; Kingstone A
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():200-8. PubMed ID: 18514172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans.
    Maravita A; Spence C; Kennett S; Driver J
    Cognition; 2002 Mar; 83(2):B25-34. PubMed ID: 11869727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age and visual field differences in computing visual-spatial relations.
    Hoyer WJ; Rybash JM
    Psychol Aging; 1992 Sep; 7(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 1388853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.