233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16099191)
1. The relative contributions of different skin layers to the mechanical behavior of human skin in vivo using suction experiments.
Hendriks FM; Brokken D; Oomens CW; Bader DL; Baaijens FP
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 16099191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of hydration and experimental length scale on the mechanical response of human skin in vivo, using optical coherence tomography.
Hendriks FM; Brokken D; Oomens CW; Baaijens FP
Skin Res Technol; 2004 Nov; 10(4):231-41. PubMed ID: 15479446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo characterization of the mechanical properties of human skin derived from MRI and indentation techniques.
Tran HV; Charleux F; Rachik M; Ehrlacher A; Ho Ba Tho MC
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Dec; 10(6):401-7. PubMed ID: 17891674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new method for the visualization and quantification of internal skin elasticity by ultrasound imaging.
Osanai O; Ohtsuka M; Hotta M; Kitaharai T; Takema Y
Skin Res Technol; 2011 Aug; 17(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 21348895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A nonlinear elastic behavior to identify the mechanical parameters of human skin in vivo.
Delalleau A; Josse G; Lagarde JM; Zahouani H; Bergheau JM
Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 18412557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A numerical-experimental method to characterize the non-linear mechanical behaviour of human skin.
Hendriks FM; Brokken D; van Eemeren JT; Oomens CW; Baaijens FP; Horsten JB
Skin Res Technol; 2003 Aug; 9(3):274-83. PubMed ID: 12877691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-vivo imaging of skin under stress: potential of high-frequency (20 MHz) static 2-D elastography.
Mofid Y; Ossant F; Imberdis C; Josse G; Patat F
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 May; 53(5):925-35. PubMed ID: 16764447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of the mechanical properties of the skin using the suction test.
Khatyr F; Imberdis C; Varchon D; Lagarde JM; Josse G
Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 16420535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of Cutometer area parameters for the study of human skin fatigue.
Dobrev H
Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 15807810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlations between small aperture skin suction parameters: statistical analysis and mechanical model.
Schlangen LJ; Brokken D; van Kemenade PM
Skin Res Technol; 2003 May; 9(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 12709130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biphasic multilayer computational model of human skin.
Sachs D; Wahlsten A; Kozerke S; Restivo G; Mazza E
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Jun; 20(3):969-982. PubMed ID: 33566274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental and numerical study on the mechanical behavior of the superficial layers of the face.
Barbarino GG; Jabareen M; Mazza E
Skin Res Technol; 2011 Nov; 17(4):434-44. PubMed ID: 21362059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic indentation on human skin in vivo: ageing effects.
Boyer G; Laquièze L; Le Bot A; Laquièze S; Zahouani H
Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 19152580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A finite element model for direction-dependent mechanical response to nanoindentation of cortical bone allowing for anisotropic post-yield behavior of the tissue.
Carnelli D; Gastaldi D; Sassi V; Contro R; Ortiz C; Vena P
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Aug; 132(8):081008. PubMed ID: 20670057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of the mechanical properties of a dermal equivalent compared with human skin in vivo by indentation and static friction tests.
Zahouani H; Pailler-Mattei C; Sohm B; Vargiolu R; Cenizo V; Debret R
Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 19152581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of layers in optical coherence tomography of skin: comparative analysis of experimental and Monte Carlo simulated images.
Shlivko IL; Kirillin MY; Donchenko EV; Ellinsky DO; Garanina OE; Neznakhina MS; Agrba PD; Kamensky VA
Skin Res Technol; 2015 Nov; 21(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 25594488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical characterization of anisotropic planar biological soft tissues using large indentation: a computational feasibility study.
Cox MA; Driessen NJ; Bouten CV; Baaijens FP
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 16706592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A mechanistic insight into the mechanical role of the stratum corneum during stretching and compression of the skin.
Leyva-Mendivil MF; Page A; Bressloff NW; Limbert G
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Sep; 49():197-219. PubMed ID: 26042766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multidirectional In Vivo Characterization of Skin Using Wiener Nonlinear Stochastic System Identification Techniques.
Parker MD; Jones LA; Hunter IW; Taberner AJ; Nash MP; Nielsen PM
J Biomech Eng; 2017 Jan; 139(1):. PubMed ID: 27760249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental and computational analysis of soft tissue stiffness in forearm using a manual indentation device.
Iivarinen JT; Korhonen RK; Julkunen P; Jurvelin JS
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Dec; 33(10):1245-53. PubMed ID: 21696992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
