372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16099363)
1. Hemispheric metacontrol and cerebral dominance in healthy individuals investigated by means of chimeric faces.
Urgesi C; Bricolo E; Aglioti SM
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 16099363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception.
George N; Jemel B; Fiori N; Chaby L; Renault B
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 15890502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The bilateral advantage for famous faces: interhemispheric communication or competition?
Baird LM; Burton AM
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1581-7. PubMed ID: 18281066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are the perceptual biases found in chimeric face processing reflected in eye-movement patterns?
Butler S; Gilchrist ID; Burt DM; Perrett DI; Jones E; Harvey M
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 15488905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A bias for the female face in the right hemisphere.
Parente R; Tommasi L
Laterality; 2008 Jul; 13(4):374-86. PubMed ID: 18592434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Reaction time to dichotic visual stimulation and its relationship to cerebral hemispheric specialization].
Coronel M; De Abreu D; Eblen-Zajjur A
Acta Cient Venez; 1999; 50(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 10513035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. One face or two? Contrasting different versions of the chimeric faces test.
Bourne VJ; Gray DL
Laterality; 2011 Sep; 16(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 21259158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex differences in face processing: Are women less lateralized and faster than men?
Godard O; Fiori N
Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 20621740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of aging and exposure duration on perceptual biases in chimeric face processing.
Butler SH; Harvey M
Cortex; 2008 Jun; 44(6):665-72. PubMed ID: 18472036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigations of hemispheric specialization of self-voice recognition.
Rosa C; Lassonde M; Pinard C; Keenan JP; Belin P
Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov; 68(2):204-14. PubMed ID: 18541355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces.
Yovel G; Tambini A; Brandman T
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Nov; 46(13):3061-8. PubMed ID: 18639566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effect of unilateral right hemisphere lesions upon recognition of faces tachistoscopically presented to the left hemisphere].
Anzola GP
Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1980 Jul; 56(14):1433-9. PubMed ID: 7004465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences between centrally and peripherally presented faces.
Liu L; Ioannides AA
Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 16564185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemispheric asymmetries in image-specific and abstractive priming of famous faces: evidence from reaction times and event-related brain potentials.
Cooper TJ; Harvey M; Lavidor M; Schweinberger SR
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Oct; 45(13):2910-21. PubMed ID: 17663008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Explicit versus implicit gaze processing assessed by ERPs.
Itier RJ; Alain C; Kovacevic N; McIntosh AR
Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1177():79-89. PubMed ID: 17916340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A bilateral occipitotemporal network mediates face perception.
Minnebusch DA; Suchan B; Köster O; Daum I
Behav Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 198(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 19041896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Asymmetry of the cerebral hemispheres during comparison of paired visual stimuli].
Udalova GP; Kashina IA
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1985; 35(3):420-7. PubMed ID: 4036318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception.
Kloth N; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR; Zwitserlood P; Bölte J; Junghöfer M
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(11):3317-21. PubMed ID: 17156392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemispheric preference of paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenics.
Magaro PA; Chamrad DL
Biol Psychiatry; 1983 Nov; 18(11):1269-85. PubMed ID: 6652163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemispheric differences in evoked potentials to faces and words.
Sobótka S; Grodzicka J
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1989; 49(5):265-80. PubMed ID: 2589111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
