These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16099365)

  • 1. The Thatcher illusion seen by the brain: an event-related brain potentials study.
    Carbon CC; Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM; Leder H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):544-55. PubMed ID: 16099365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception.
    George N; Jemel B; Fiori N; Chaby L; Renault B
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 15890502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: an ERP study of the Thatcher illusion.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW; Praamstra P; Warbrick T
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):352-67. PubMed ID: 16632381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why is the N170 enhanced for inverted faces? An ERP competition experiment.
    Sadeh B; Yovel G
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):782-9. PubMed ID: 20558303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):955-75. PubMed ID: 12881166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Category-sensitivity in the N170 range: a question of topography and inversion, not one of amplitude.
    Boehm SG; Dering B; Thierry G
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):2082-9. PubMed ID: 21477606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1518-32. PubMed ID: 15050576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological neural mechanisms for detection, configural analysis and recognition of faces.
    Anaki D; Zion-Golumbic E; Bentin S
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 37(4):1407-16. PubMed ID: 17689102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misaligning face halves increases and delays the N170 specifically for upright faces: implications for the nature of early face representations.
    Jacques C; Rossion B
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():96-109. PubMed ID: 20051235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inversion and configuration of faces.
    Bartlett JC; Searcy J
    Cogn Psychol; 1993 Jul; 25(3):281-316. PubMed ID: 8354050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Holistic processing of faces: learning effects with Mooney faces.
    Latinus M; Taylor MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1316-27. PubMed ID: 16197686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related brain potentials reveal anomalies in temporal processing of faces in autism spectrum disorder.
    McPartland J; Dawson G; Webb SJ; Panagiotides H; Carver LJ
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 Oct; 45(7):1235-45. PubMed ID: 15335344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Turn that frown upside down: ERP effects of thatcherization of misorientated faces.
    Milivojevic B; Clapp WC; Johnson BW; Corballis MC
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Nov; 40(6):967-78. PubMed ID: 14986850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: an event-related brain potential study.
    Sui J; Zhu Y; Han S
    Neuroreport; 2006 Mar; 17(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 16514370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: holistic and part-based processes.
    Sagiv N; Bentin S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):937-51. PubMed ID: 11595097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial-temporal analysis of face processing using an ERP study of the Thatcher illusion.
    Gu X; Li Y; Yang X; Zhu Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():2496-9. PubMed ID: 18002501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Context influences early perceptual analysis of faces--an electrophysiological study.
    Righart R; de Gelder B
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Sep; 16(9):1249-57. PubMed ID: 16306325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study.
    Eskelund K; MacDonald EN; Andersen TS
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception.
    Kloth N; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR; Zwitserlood P; Bölte J; Junghöfer M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(11):3317-21. PubMed ID: 17156392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.