BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16099683)

  • 1. Estimating and comparing diagnostic tests' accuracy when the gold standard is not binary.
    Obuchowski NA
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 16099683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wilcoxon-based group sequential designs for comparison of areas under two correlated ROC curves.
    Zhou XH; Li SM; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 17357988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of likelihood ratios for comparisons of binary diagnostic tests: underlying ROC curves.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5821-30. PubMed ID: 21158294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonparametric and semiparametric group sequential methods for comparing accuracy of diagnostic tests.
    Tang L; Emerson SS; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1137-45. PubMed ID: 18371124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):453-70. PubMed ID: 9629639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
    Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating diagnostic test accuracy using a "fuzzy gold standard".
    Phelps CE; Hutson A
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 7898298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical validation based on parametric receiver operating characteristic analysis of continuous classification data.
    Zou KH; Warfield SK; Fielding JR; Tempany CM; William MW; Kaus MR; Jolesz FA; Kikinis R
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Dec; 10(12):1359-68. PubMed ID: 14697004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. COMPROC and CHECKNORM: computer programs for comparing accuracies of diagnostic tests using ROC curves in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhou XH; Higgs RE
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1998 Nov; 57(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 9822855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
    Yang Y; Jin Z
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data.
    Obuchowski NA
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):567-78. PubMed ID: 9192452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random effects models for assessing diagnostic accuracy of traditional Chinese doctors in absence of a gold standard.
    Wang Z; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(7):661-71. PubMed ID: 21626532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
    Song HH
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonparametric methods for analysing the accuracy of diagnostic tests with multiple readers.
    Kaufmann J; Werner C; Brunner E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Apr; 14(2):129-46. PubMed ID: 15807148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Random effects modeling approaches for estimating ROC curves from repeated ordinal tests without a gold standard.
    Albert PS
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):593-602. PubMed ID: 17688512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.