BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

565 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16100177)

  • 1. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity and global end-diastolic volume index reliably predict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients.
    Broch O; Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Höcker J; Schöttler J; Steinfath M; Bein B
    J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):325.e7-13. PubMed ID: 21855280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac pre-load during open heart surgery.
    Rex S; Schälte G; Schroth S; de Waal EE; Metzelder S; Overbeck Y; Rossaint R; Buhre W
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Oct; 51(9):1258-67. PubMed ID: 17714575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions.
    Reuter DA; Goepfert MS; Goresch T; Schmoeckel M; Kilger E; Goetz AE
    Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 15591333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants and neonates undergoing congenital heart surgery.
    Renner J; Broch O; Duetschke P; Scheewe J; Höcker J; Moseby M; Jung O; Bein B
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Jan; 108(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 22113930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of volume response under open-chest conditions during coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Sander M; Spies CD; Berger K; Grubitzsch H; Foer A; Krämer M; Carl M; von Heymann C
    Crit Care; 2007; 11(6):R121. PubMed ID: 18034888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
    Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
    Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echochardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter.
    Belloni L; Pisano A; Natale A; Piccirillo MR; Piazza L; Ismeno G; De Martino G
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Apr; 22(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 18375327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
    Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.
    Renner J; Gruenewald M; Quaden R; Hanss R; Meybohm P; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):650-8. PubMed ID: 19114894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of preload assessment by different transesophageal echocardiographic techniques in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Hofer CK; Ganter MT; Rist A; Klaghofer R; Matter-Ensner S; Zollinger A
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Apr; 22(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 18375326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study.
    Vos JJ; Poterman M; Salm PP; Van Amsterdam K; Struys MM; Scheeren TW; Kalmar AF
    Can J Anaesth; 2015 Nov; 62(11):1153-60. PubMed ID: 26335905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulse-pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness during heart displacement for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Lee JH; Jeon Y; Bahk JH; Gil NS; Kim KB; Hong DM; Kim HJ
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1056-62. PubMed ID: 21924634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, and pleth variability index in predicting fluid responsiveness during different positive end expiratory pressure in prone position.
    Chen Y; Fu Q; Mi WD
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2015 Apr; 37(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 25936706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.
    Kim KM; Kim GS; Han M
    Singapore Med J; 2022 Dec; 63(12):731-739. PubMed ID: 34911180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation.
    Jun JH; Chung RK; Baik HJ; Chung MH; Hyeon JS; Lee YG; Park SH
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):142. PubMed ID: 31390982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of volume-responsiveness during one-lung ventilation: a comparison of static, volumetric, and dynamic parameters of cardiac preload.
    Trepte CJ; Haas SA; Nitzschke R; Salzwedel C; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1094-100. PubMed ID: 23972740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemodynamic pressure waveform analysis in predicting fluid responsiveness.
    Roy S; Couture P; Qizilbash B; Toupin F; Levesque S; Carrier M; Lambert J; Denault AY
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Aug; 27(4):676-80. PubMed ID: 23849524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.
    Lee JH; Kim JT; Yoon SZ; Lim YJ; Jeon Y; Bahk JH; Kim CS
    Br J Anaesth; 2007 Sep; 99(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 17621598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.