306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16100544)
21. Effective doses to patients from CT acquisitions on the GE Infinia Hawkeye: a comparison of calculation methods.
Sawyer LJ; Starritt HC; Hiscock SC; Evans MJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Feb; 29(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 18094636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Helical CT pelvimetry: advantages of a low dose volume acquisition technique].
Breidt D; Bouquigny F; Clément JP; Menéchal P; Levert M; Quéreux C; Piérot L
J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 84(9):1027-30. PubMed ID: 13679759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Current status of patient radiation doses from computed tomography examinations in Tanzania.
Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 16461483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A low-dose CT-pelvimetry.
Suramo I; Torniainen P; Jouppila P; Kirkinen P; Lähde S
Br J Radiol; 1984 Jan; 57(673):35-7. PubMed ID: 6704646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Patient dose estimation for multi-detector-row CT examinations.
Nishizawa K; Mori S; Ohno M; Yanagawa N; Yoshida T; Akahane K; Iwai K; Wada S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17595212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Practical CT dosimetry.
Yoshizumi TT; Suneja SK; Teal JS
Radiol Technol; 1989; 60(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 2762539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Comparison of classic and digital pelvimetry for measuring the medial transverse diameter in 50 female patients].
Montoy JC; Ravaux S; Blache G
J Radiol; 1990 Nov; 71(11):633-8. PubMed ID: 2283626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computed tomography pelvimetry: accuracy and radiation dose compared with conventional pelvimetry.
Morris CW; Heggie JC; Acton CM
Australas Radiol; 1993 May; 37(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 8512510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Technical note: digital radiographic pelvimetry--a novel, low dose, accurate technique.
Wright DJ; Godding L; Kirkpatrick C
Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):528-30. PubMed ID: 7788241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative dose levels between CT-scanner and slot-scanning device (EOS system) in pregnant women pelvimetry.
Ben Abdennebi A; Aubry S; Ounalli L; Fayache MS; Delabrousse E; Petegnief Y
Phys Med; 2017 Jan; 33():77-86. PubMed ID: 27993442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
Koller F; Roth J
Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiation doses for pregnant women in the late pregnancy undergoing fetal-computed tomography: a comparison of dosimetry and Monte Carlo simulations.
Matsunaga Y; Kawaguchi A; Kobayashi M; Suzuki S; Suzuki S; Chida K
Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Jun; 10(2):148-154. PubMed ID: 27645287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; Zankl M; Angel E; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2583-97. PubMed ID: 17440254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of radiation doses between cone beam CT and multi detector CT: TLD measurements.
Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Yoo S; Yin FF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 19074786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radiation doses to patients during selected CT procedures at four hospitals in Tanzania.
Muhogora WE; Nyanda AM; Ngoye WM; Shao D
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 16165335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Low dose pelvimetry with biplane digital radiography.
Lotz H; Ekelund L; Hietala SO; Eriksson L; Wiklund DE; Wickman G
Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(5):577-80. PubMed ID: 2960351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
