These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16100552)
1. [Analysis of prothrombin time in primary health care]. Trydal T; Bolann B; Brosstad F; Sandberg S; Sandset PM; Stavelin A; Steensland H; Thue G; Ødegaard OR Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Aug; 125(15):2048-9. PubMed ID: 16100552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. External quality assessment for prothrombin time/international normalised ratio using point-of-care devices: split-sample or conventional external quality assessment using control samples? Kitchen D; Murray E; Kitchen S; Jennings I; Fitzmaurice D; Woods T; Walker I Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(7):673-5; author reply 676-7. PubMed ID: 17963156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rebuttal to: strong lupus anticoagulant can influence the prothrombin time INR falsifying the follow up of oral anticoagulation. Bailleul E; Van Vaerenbergh K; Lust A Thromb Haemost; 2005 Sep; 94(3):687; author reply 688. PubMed ID: 16268495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sample carryover in PT-INR determination is it an issue in Oral Anticoagulant Therapy control? Corno AR; Redaelli R; Caimi TM; Mostarda G; Caruso R; Morra E Thromb Res; 2011 Mar; 127(3):279-81. PubMed ID: 21129767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Choice of PT-INR instruments in primary health care]. Stavelin A; Omenås B; Bolann B; Christensen NG; Sandberg S Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Nov; 128(22):2620. PubMed ID: 19023367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality control of CoaguChek test strips in the Netherlands. van den Besselaar AM; Hoekstra MM; van der Meer FJ Thromb Haemost; 2007 Feb; 97(2):323-4. PubMed ID: 17264967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Local international normalised ratio (INR) derivation simplified using the European concerted action on anticoagulation (ECAA) prothrombin time/INR line. Poller L; Jespersen J Thromb Res; 2011 Aug; 128(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 21658749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The prothrombin time-derived international normalized ratio: great for Warfarin, fair for prognosis and bad for liver-bleeding risk. Caldwell S; Shah N Liver Int; 2008 Dec; 28(10):1325-7. PubMed ID: 19055640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. External quality assessment of prothrombin time: the split-sample model compared with external quality assessment with commercial control material. Sølvik UØ; Stavelin A; Christensen NG; Sandberg S Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(4):337-49. PubMed ID: 16777762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. International normalized ratio (INR) testing in Europe: between-laboratory comparability of test results obtained by Quick and Owren reagents. Meijer P; Kynde K; van den Besselaar AMHP; Van Blerk M; Woods TAL Clin Chem Lab Med; 2018 Sep; 56(10):1698-1703. PubMed ID: 29648992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time assay considerations. Ng VL Clin Lab Med; 2009 Jun; 29(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 19665677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A national field study of quality assessment of CoaguChek point-of-care testing prothrombin time monitors. Meijer P; Kluft C; Poller L; van der Meer FJ; Keown M; Ibrahim S; van den Besselaar AM; Tripodi A; Jespersen J Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Nov; 126(5):756-61. PubMed ID: 17050073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extrapolation method: as effective as the conventional methods for INR determination. Gupta M; Mohanty S; Saxena R Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 47(2):306. PubMed ID: 16295509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]